You are here:

HAK_MTL

HAK_MTL

Representation Score

8.0/10

Excellent

2019

Director

Alexandre Sheldon

Runtime

67 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

HAK_MTL functions primarily as a systemic critique of the digital economy and mass surveillance. Its strength lies in deconstructing the idea of technological progress, instead framing it as a site of struggle against predatory institutions. However, the film lacks specific focus on individual identity. While the global scale suggests a diverse cast of stakeholders, the narrative remains centered on technological battles rather than personal or characters who reflect more than one aspect of diversity. Ultimately, the documentary provides a progressive critique of power dynamics but offers little visibility into specific underrepresented identities, such as LGBTQ+ or disabled communities.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does HAK_MTL have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film focuses on the technological and political implications of surveillance rather than identity politics. There are no explicit LGBTQ+ characters or narratives centered around non-straight identities.

How does HAK_MTL portray gender?

Fair

The narrative prioritizes a geopolitical lens over specific character arcs. While the hacker struggle disrupts traditional hierarchies, there is no clear evidence of gendered ability to act or subverted masculine leadership.

How racially and ethnically diverse is HAK_MTL?

Good

The film adopts a global scope, addressing how corporations and governments capture information worldwide. This internationalist framework suggests a diverse range of global actors and digital activists.

How does HAK_MTL represent religion and culture?

Good

The documentary leans toward anti-capitalist and anti-institutional themes. It challenges the perceived benevolence of modern state and corporate structures through an oppressor/oppressed framework.

Does HAK_MTL include disability representation?

Fair

There is no information regarding the inclusion of neurodivergent individuals or those with physical disabilities. Without verified evidence of characters with disabilities exercising ability to act, the score remains low.

Present on Screen

  • The global scope suggests a diverse, non-Anglo-centric perspective on digital surveillance.
  • The film effectively critiques established power dynamics and corporate hegemony.
  • It challenges traditional institutional narratives by framing the internet as a surveillance machine.

Limited or Absent

  • The film lacks explicit representation of LGBTQ+ identities or narratives.
  • There is no evidence of neurodivergent or physically disabled individuals exercising ability to act.
  • The narrative prioritizes systemic critique over individual gendered ability to act or character arcs.

Official Synopsis

Does privacy still exist in 2019? In less than a generation, the internet has become a mass surveillance machine based on one simple mindset: If it's free, you're the product. Our information is captured, stored and made accessible to corporations and governments across the world. To the hacker community, Big Brother is real and only a technological battle can defeat him.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.