New Showbiz

You are here:
RR

RR

2007

Director

James Benning

Runtime

115 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Looping, chugging and barreling by, the trains in Benning's latest monumental film map a stunning topography and a history of American development. RR comes three decades after Benning and Bette Gordon made The United States of America (1975), a cinematic journey along the country’s interstates that is keenly aware “of superhighways and railroad tracks as American public symbols.” A political essay responding to the economic histories of trains as instruments in a culture of hyper-consumption, RR articulates its concern most explicitly when Eisenhower's military-industrial complex speech is heard as a mile long coal train passes through eastern Wyoming. Benning spent two and a half years collecting two hundred and sixteen shots of trains, forty-three of which appear in RR. The locomotives' varying colors, speeds, vectors, and reverberations are charged with visual thrills, romance and a nostalgia heightened by Benning's declaration that this will be his last work in 16mm film.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

1.1/10

Minimal

Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film contains no human subjects, preventing any depiction of gender identity or sexual orientation. There is no presence of non-cisnormative identities.

Gender Representation

Minimal

As a formalist study of landscapes and machinery, the film lacks a cast. Traditional gendered power dynamics are not present.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

The narrative focuses on mechanical and geological aspects of the American West. There is no depiction of specific racial or ethnic groups.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The film critiques Western institutions by layering Eisenhower’s speech over coal trains. This disrupts purely nostalgic views of American expansion and hyper-consumption.

Disability Representation

Minimal

The film does not feature human characters. Consequently, there is no representation of physical or neurodivergent identities.

Strengths

  • Provides a sophisticated critique of American capitalism and industrialism.
  • Disrupts nostalgic views of expansion through the use of historical political speech.
  • Offers a postmodern deconstruction of traditional progress narratives.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks human-centric storytelling and character-driven social discourse.
  • Provides no representation of gender, race, or sexual orientation due to its focus on machinery.
  • Does not engage with identity politics or intersectional representation.

AI Analysis

RR is a structuralist documentary that prioritizes formalist exploration over traditional narrative. By focusing on long, static shots of locomotives and topography, the film functions as a cinematic essay on industrial movement and the American environment. Because the work lacks human characters, dialogue, or interpersonal conflict, it operates outside the conventional frameworks of identity-based representation. It does not engage with identity politics or intersectional representation in a traditional sense. However, the film offers a sophisticated critique of systemic structures. It challenges viewers to see the landscape as a site of historical and economic tension rather than mere scenery.

How are these scores produced? →

Similar Movies

Movie poster for North on Evers

North on Evers

1992

No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.0 out of 10

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.