
Life After Pi
2014

2015
PG-13Director
James Erskine
Runtime
91 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
After six weeks of gruelling competition, England battle reigning champions Australia. The two teams are inseparable after eighty minutes. Deep into extra time, there are just two minutes left on the clock. England rumble to within 40 yards of the posts. The ball is sent spiralling back to Jonny Wilkinson, the golden boy of English rugby, in a split second he drop kicks for goal and a chance for sporting immortality. It is an astonishing story of pressure, expectation and courage, tracing the roots of success back to the professionalization of the game in the 90s and culminating in that glorious World Cup campaign of 2003 that turned Woodward’s poisoned chalice into a golden cup.
Overall Score
Good
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film focuses on the Victorian-era partnership of John and Frances Colenso. It contains no evidence of non-cisnormative identities or same-sex intimacy.
Gender Representation
Frances Colenso is presented as an intellectual partner rather than a submissive domestic figure. Her agency is highlighted through her active participation in missionary endeavors.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The narrative engages with post-colonial themes by depicting interactions between British administration and the Zulu people. It avoids a purely Eurocentric perspective by centering indigenous rights.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film critiques the rigid structures of the Anglican Church and British colonial administration. It explores the tension between institutional dogma and individual conscience.
Disability Representation
No specific depictions of visible or invisible disabilities are present in the narrative.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Building Jerusalem functions as a sophisticated historical critique of the British Empire. It succeeds by deconstructing moral absolutes and presenting a narrative where truth is shaped by the intersection of science, faith, and human rights. The film's strength lies in its progressive narrative complexity. By elevating the agency of both a female lead and a protagonist who challenges state authority, it moves beyond traditional biographical tropes. While the film offers nuanced social commentary, it remains bound by the heteronormative and historical constraints of the 19th century, resulting in a lack of LGBTQ+ representation.

2014

2011

2011

2024

2017

2023

1975

2020

2012

2019

1996

1964
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.