
The Dissident
2020

2017
Director
Joe Piscatella
Runtime
78 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
When the Chinese Communist Party backtracks on its promise of autonomy to Hong Kong, teenager Joshua Wong decides to save his city. Rallying thousands of kids to skip school and occupy the streets, Joshua becomes an unlikely leader in Hong Kong and one of China’s most notorious dissidents.
Overall Score
Good
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film focuses strictly on geopolitical and civil rights activism. There is no evidence of LGBTQ+ characters or narratives addressing non-cisnormative identities.
Gender Representation
The narrative highlights the agency of a young male protagonist in a leadership role. It does not explicitly engage in the deconstruction of traditional masculinity or gendered power dynamics.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The documentary provides a platform for non-Western perspectives by centering the lived experiences of Hong Kong citizens. It disrupts the traditional Western-centric gaze often found in global political documentaries.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film portrays traditional political structures as oppressive forces being challenged by grassroots movements. It emphasizes the importance of collective identity in the face of systemic pressure.
Disability Representation
There is no specific evidence regarding the portrayal of neurodivergence or physical disabilities within the film's context.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
The documentary serves as a powerful study of political agency and the disruption of institutional power. It succeeds by centering a non-Western struggle, providing a necessary counter-narrative to traditional geopolitical storytelling through the lens of Hong Kong's resistance. However, the film's scope is narrow, focusing almost exclusively on state-level hegemony and civil rights. This specialization results in a lack of representation for identity-based categories like LGBTQ+ or disability, which are not addressed in the narrative. Ultimately, the film's value lies in its critique of centralized authority. While it lacks intersectional breadth, it offers a significant disruption of established political hierarchies by celebrating grassroots, anti-establishment mobilization.

2020

2011

2014

2012

2017

2017

1968

2015

2015

2015

2017

2018
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.