You are here:
Fast, Cheap & Out of Control

Fast, Cheap & Out of Control

1997

PG

Director

Errol Morris

Runtime

83 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Errol Morris’s Fast, Cheap & Out of Control interweaves the stories of four men, each driven to create eccentric worlds from their unique obsessions, all of which involve animals. There’s a lion tamer who shares his theories on the mental processes of wild animals; a topiary gardener who has devoted a lifetime to shaping bears and giraffes out of hedges and trees; a man fascinated with hairless mole rats; and an MIT scientist who has designed complex, autonomous robots that can crawl like bugs.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.7/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The film lacks explicit depictions of LGBTQ+ identities or narratives. The focus remains on individual obsessions rather than sexual orientation or gender identity.

Gender Representation

Fair

The narrative architecture is primarily centered on male subjects and their specific obsessions. It lacks significant female agency or the subversion of masculine roles.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The film does not feature a diverse or non-Anglo-Saxon majority cast. The subjects reflect a relatively homogeneous demographic typical of the subcultures being studied.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The film excels by prioritizing situational ethics and the subjectivity of truth. It disrupts traditional moralizing roles by presenting the self-justifying logic of its subjects.

Disability Representation

Fair

The film explores intense, obsessive-compulsive fixations without framing them as disabilities for mockery. However, it lacks explicit evidence of casting individuals with lived disabilities.

Strengths

  • The film successfully dismantles the concept of objective truth through a sophisticated, postmodernist narrative lens.
  • It avoids traditional moralizing, instead offering a nuanced look at the subjective logic of its subjects.
  • The documentary provides a deep, psychological study of individual agency and intense personal fixations.

Areas for Improvement

  • The film lacks significant representation of female agency or diverse gender identities.
  • There is a notable absence of racial and ethnic diversity among the featured subjects.
  • The narrative does not include explicit depictions of LGBTQ+ identities or experiences.

AI Analysis

Errol Morris’s documentary is a formalist study of human obsession rather than a demographic survey. While it excels in cultural representation by deconstructing traditional authority and objective truth, it fails to provide meaningful visibility for diverse identities. The film's strength lies in its postmodernist approach to storytelling. By elevating the subjective perspectives of its subjects, it challenges the standard, authoritative documentary voice. However, the work is notably narrow in its demographic scope. It relies heavily on a homogeneous cast of male subjects, leaving little room for LGBTQ+, racial, or gender diversity.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.