New Showbiz

You are here:
The Trouble with 'Marnie'

The Trouble with 'Marnie'

2000

Director

Laurent Bouzereau

Runtime

58 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

This hour long documentary on the making of Alfred Hitchcock's "Marnie" incorporates the usual melange of contemporary interviews with surviving participants and liberal helpings of film clips and production shots. It also presents a nice selection of script pages and memos as well. In the former category we find cast members 'Tippi' Hedren, Diane Baker, and Louise Latham, rejected screenwriters Joseph Stefano and Evan Hunter, final screenwriter Jay Presson Allen, daughter Pat Hitchcock O'Connell, production designer Robert Boyle, makeup artist Howard Smit, unit manager Hilton Green, Hitchcock historian Robin Wood, composer Bernard Herrmann biographer Steven C. Smith, and Hitchcock fan/filmmaker Peter Bogdanovich. An entertaining account of the film's production, the participants offer loads of valuable information and anecdotes. Highly enjoyable for Hitchcock fans and the film's growing number of admirers.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.9/10

Fair

Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

The documentary functions as a retrospective lens on a 1964 thriller. While it lacks explicit non-heteronormative depictions, the inclusion of scholar Robin Wood introduces a framework for analyzing queer subtext.

Gender Representation

Good

The film provides significant agency to female contributors like Tippi Hedren and Diane Baker. This structure disrupts the traditional male gaze often associated with Hitchcock's original production.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The interviewee list reflects the demographic realities of mid-century Hollywood and late 20th-century academia. The participants are predominantly Anglo-Saxon, mirroring the historical context of the era.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

By featuring rejected screenwriters and historians, the film challenges the singular authority of the auteur. This approach promotes intellectual pluralism over a traditionalist, singular morality.

Disability Representation

Minimal

The documentary focuses on technical and historical production aspects. There is no evidence regarding how neurodivergence or mental health is treated within this specific framework.

Strengths

  • Provides significant agency to female contributors and cast members.
  • Challenges the singular authority of the director through diverse perspectives.
  • Utilizes academic rigor to offer a nuanced, intellectual critique.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks significant racial and ethnic diversity among the interviewees.
  • Does not feature explicit depictions of non-heteronormative identities.
  • Provides no clear insight into the representation of disability or neurodivergence.

AI Analysis

Laurent Bouzereau’s documentary succeeds as a sophisticated archival tool that subverts traditional filmmaking hierarchies. By centering the voices of female cast members and various collaborators, it moves beyond a purely masculine analysis of the Hitchcockian era. However, the film remains tethered to the demographic limitations of its subject matter. The lack of racial diversity among interviewees and the absence of explicit LGBTQ+ narratives reflect the historical period being studied rather than active disruption of those norms. Ultimately, the work provides a fragmented and subjective view of creative truth. It trades the myth of the singular director for a more inclusive, academic perspective on the production process.

How are these scores produced? →

Similar Movies

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.