The Making of 'Jaws'
1995
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.7 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
The Making of 'Psycho'
2005
Director
Laurent Bouzereau
Runtime
94 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
A retrospective on the entire movie, from start to finish. There are interviews with many of the principle cast and crew (including Janet Leigh and Joseph Stefano), who all talk openly and lovingly about entire process of making the film. The sessions with Janet Leigh are particularly involving, and she talks a great deal about shooting the now infamous shower scene.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
2.8/10
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The documentary focuses on the technical mechanics of filmmaking rather than social narratives. It lacks explicit LGBTQ+ character arcs or critiques of heteronormativity.
Gender Representation
Janet Leigh provides a significant platform to discuss her professional agency and expertise. However, the film remains centered on the traditional Hollywood studio system's historical hierarchies.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The interviewed cast and crew reflect the demographic homogeneity of the mid-century American film industry. It serves as a historical record of a period lacking significant diversity.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
This archival piece celebrates the legacy of Alfred Hitchcock and classical filmmaking. It reinforces traditional film industry institutions rather than engaging in cultural critiques.
Disability Representation
The retrospective does not address neurodivergence, physical disabilities, or mental health conditions as central themes or provide specific agency to these topics.
Strengths
- Provides a platform for Janet Leigh to discuss her professional expertise and agency.
- Offers a respectful and detailed archival look at classical filmmaking techniques.
Areas for Improvement
- Reflects the demographic homogeneity and lack of diversity inherent in the 1960s studio system.
- Lacks engagement with LGBTQ+ narratives or critiques of traditional social structures.
AI Analysis
This documentary functions as a pedagogical archive of cinematic history. Its primary goal is to deconstruct the technical processes of a 1960 horror classic rather than to subvert social hierarchies. The content inherently reflects the demographic constraints of the mid-20th century. Because it documents a specific historical era, the subjects and professional dynamics remain largely homogeneous and traditional. While it offers valuable insight into the professional agency of female leads like Janet Leigh, it does not actively seek to disrupt or critique the cultural norms of the period it covers.
Similar Movies
The Making of 'Cape Fear'
2001
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.2 out of 10
The Making of 'The Man Who Knew Too Much'
2000
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.6 out of 10
The Making of 'Scarface'
1998
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.9 out of 10
Conan Unchained: The Making of 'Conan'
2000
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.8 out of 10
The Making of 'Carlito's Way'
2003
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.6 out of 10
The Making of 'Close Encounters of the Third Kind'
2001
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.2 out of 10
The Making of 'American Graffiti'
1998
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.7 out of 10
Making 'Taxi Driver'
1999
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.5 out of 10
All About 'The Birds'
2000
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.4 out of 10
'The Trouble with Harry' Isn't Over
2001
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.3 out of 10
Hitchcock and Dial M
2004
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.7 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.