You are here:

Traces of Sin

Traces of Sin

Representation Score

7.4/10

Good

2017

Director

Kei Ishikawa

Runtime

120 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Kei Ishikawa’s thriller succeeds by exposing the myths surrounding the 'perfect' family and societal facades. It moves away from simple good-versus-evil binaries to explore how systemic failures enable injustices to persist. The film’s strength lies in its intellectual depth, particularly in critiquing judicial institutions and embracing moral relativism. It questions the sanctity of absolute justice through a sophisticated, postmodern lens. However, the film lacks broad demographic representation. It offers limited LGBTQ+ representation, diverse cultural backgrounds, or visible empowerment of individuals with disabilities, remaining largely focused on a specific cultural context.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Traces of Sin have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film adheres to conventional assumptions about straight relationships and gender matching assigned at birth. It does not prominently feature LGBTQ+ identities or diverse gender expressions.

How does Traces of Sin portray gender?

Fair

The story breaks down the 'perfect wife' stereotype, showing psychological complexity beyond just being submissive. However, the narrative focuses mainly on a male investigator's viewpoint.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Traces of Sin?

Fair

Set in modern Japan, the film showcases a primarily Japanese cast. It serves as a culturally specific study rather than a diverse representation of various backgrounds.

How does Traces of Sin represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The film stands out by questioning institutional integrity and the limitations of the legal system. It shifts from absolute morality to a nuanced, postmodern exploration of wrongdoing and punishment.

Does Traces of Sin include disability representation?

Fair

Psychological trauma and mental health issues drive the plot. However, these elements support the thriller's mechanics rather than exploring neurodivergence or empowering individuals with disabilities.

Present on Screen

  • Sophisticated breakdown of traditional family stereotypes and societal facades.
  • Deep examination of moral relativism and the shortcomings of legal institutions.
  • Avoids simplistic hero-villain binaries in favor of psychological complexity.

Limited or Absent

  • Needs more explicit LGBTQ+ representation or narrative drivers.
  • Could benefit from greater racial and cultural diversity.
  • Gender subversion is limited by a male-centric investigative focus.

Official Synopsis

A year has gone by without any progress on the Tako family's murder, in which an elite businessman, his beautiful and perfect wife, and adorable daughter were brutally killed. Weekly magazine journalist Tanaka gives the case another shot and digs for the truth, but people connected with the case describe a family far-flung from the seemingly picture-perfect couple, and then he discovers a reality more terrifying than anyone had imagined.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.