You are here:
¡El que no corre... vuela!

¡El que no corre... vuela!

1982

Director

Gilberto Martínez Solares

Runtime

92 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

After mistakenly going to jail, Maria makes friends with a woman whose kids live in the streets and Maria gets the idea to help them.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.4/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film contains no evidence of non-heteronormative identities. There are no narratives present that critique heteronormativity.

Gender Representation

Fair

The story centers on a female protagonist, Maria, and her connections with other women. However, it is unclear if the film subverts traditional roles or reinforces domestic archetypes.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Good

As a Mexican production, the film features a non-Anglo-Saxon majority cast. The focus on street children suggests an exploration of class and social status.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The narrative touches on social inequity and the struggles of disenfranchised street children. It potentially critiques institutional efficacy through a moralistic or social lens.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no specific information regarding the portrayal of physical or neurodivergent disabilities in this work.

Strengths

  • The film provides a female-centric lens by centering the narrative on Maria.
  • The plot explores themes of socioeconomic disparity and the plight of marginalized youth.

Areas for Improvement

  • The narrative lacks documented complexity regarding intersectional or postmodern social critique.
  • There is no evidence of representation for LGBTQ+ identities or neurodivergent disabilities.

AI Analysis

¡El que no corre... vuela! functions as a traditional social comedy that addresses socioeconomic marginalization. The plot follows Maria as she navigates a wrongful imprisonment and seeks to help street children. While the film engages with themes of institutional error and class disparity, it appears to operate within the conventional comedic frameworks of the early 1980s. It lacks the documented complexity required for a more progressive social critique. The production relies on broad comedic archetypes rather than a systemic deconstruction of social hierarchies, resulting in a narrative that focuses on individual advocacy rather than intersectional analysis.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.