You are here:
The Wizard of the Emerald City, Part I

The Wizard of the Emerald City, Part I

2025

Director

Igor Voloshin

Runtime

104 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Ellie lives in a distant city. One day, the evil witch Gingema conjured a hurricane that took Ellie and her dog Totoshka to the country of the Munchkins. To return home, Ellie and her friends the Scarecrow, the Tin Woodman and the Cowardly Lion will set off along the yellow brick road to the Emerald City in search of the Wizard who will grant their cherished wishes.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.0/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The film lacks explicit evidence of LGBTQ+ characters or non-cisnormative identities. The narrative focuses on a traditional quest involving a central quartet of friends without visible queer representation.

Gender Representation

Fair

Ellie serves as the central female protagonist driving the journey. While critics note an infectious chemistry among the characters, the film does not appear to subvert traditional gender hierarchies.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

The fantasy setting of the Munchkin country allows for diverse character designs through non-human species. However, the cast remains predominantly Russian without confirmed evidence of race-bent casting.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The story follows a classic hero's journey centered on achieving cherished wishes. It adheres to traditional fairy-tale moral frameworks rather than critiquing established social or religious institutions.

Disability Representation

Limited

Characters like the Tin Woodman and Scarecrow possess traits that could mirror physical or psychological differences. However, these are treated as fantastical archetypes rather than characters navigating actual disability.

Strengths

  • The film features a strong female protagonist in Ellie who drives the central adventure.
  • The character chemistry among the quartet of friends provides an organic and infectious charm.
  • The fantasy setting offers a framework for diverse character designs through non-human species.

Areas for Improvement

  • The film lacks visible representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisnormative characters.
  • Physical and psychological differences are treated as magical tropes rather than authentic disability representation.
  • The narrative follows conventional cultural frameworks without deconstructing traditional social institutions.

AI Analysis

The film functions as a traditional high-fantasy adaptation that prioritizes genre-standard storytelling. It relies heavily on established fairy-tale structures and classical adventure tropes to drive its narrative. While the production offers organic charm and character-driven dynamics, it lacks the intersectional complexity required to disrupt social hierarchies. The representation remains largely conventional and archetype-based. Ultimately, the work leans toward a standard hero's journey. It provides a familiar experience for family audiences but avoids progressive subversions of identity or culture.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.