The film focuses on abstract, mechanical, and non-human forms. There is no identifiable presence of LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisnormative gender expressions.

By utilizing inanimate objects instead of human protagonists, the film avoids traditional gender hierarchies. However, this absence lacks active gendered agency or deliberate social subversion.

Heavy textures and shadows obscure specific racial or ethnic markers. The work avoids identity politics in favor of a dream-like, universalist aesthetic.

The film disrupts Western narrative traditions by prioritizing non-linear, secular experiences. It avoids traditional institutions but lacks explicit systemic or anti-capitalist critiques.

Mechanical and glitchy movements evoke uncanny sensory experiences. However, these are aesthetic choices rather than intentional portrayals of characters with disabilities.