You are here:
Robin Hood

Robin Hood

2018

PG-13

Director

Otto Bathurst

Runtime

116 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

A war-hardened Crusader and his Moorish commander mount an audacious revolt against the corrupt English crown.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

3.9/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film adheres to traditional heteronormative structures. There is no visible presence of non-cisnormative identities or same-sex intimacy within the character arcs.

Gender Representation

Good

Marian disrupts medieval hierarchies by participating in tactical and combat elements of the rebellion. While she avoids the 'damsel in distress' trope, the central leadership remains largely male-dominated.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

The cast is predominantly white, reflecting the historical setting. However, the inclusion of a Moorish commander introduces ethnic complexity to the Crusader era.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The narrative critiques centralized monarchical systems by framing the English Crown as corrupt. It validates rebellion as a necessary tool for the disenfranchised to seek justice.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There are no prominent depictions of visible or invisible disabilities. No characters have arcs defined by neurodivergence or physical impairment.

Strengths

  • Marian is granted agency and combat roles, challenging traditional gender tropes.
  • The inclusion of a Moorish commander adds ethnic complexity to the historical setting.
  • The narrative effectively critiques oppressive institutional authority and monarchical corruption.

Areas for Improvement

  • The film lacks any visible representation of LGBTQ+ identities.
  • There is a complete absence of characters with visible or invisible disabilities.
  • The primary cast remains largely monolithic and lacks broad ethnic diversity.

AI Analysis

Otto Bathurst’s adaptation focuses on the breakdown of social orders and the struggle against institutional authority. The film finds its footing by subverting traditional power dynamics and granting female characters significant agency in the physical struggle. However, the film remains demographically traditional. The lack of LGBTQ+ representation and the predominantly white, European cast limit the scope of its intersectional impact. Ultimately, the film is a study of anti-authoritarianism that succeeds in its thematic critique of tyranny but fails to provide a diverse range of identities.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.