You are here:
Islam: The Untold Story

Islam: The Untold Story

2012

Runtime

74 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

A historian, Tom Holland, looks at the origins of Islam and questions it's history and authenticity.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.3/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The documentary focuses on historical religious and political developments. It contains no LGBTQ+ characters or narratives addressing queer theory.

Gender Representation

Fair

The film touches upon women's roles within early Islamic structures. However, it lacks agency-driven narratives and functions more as a historical survey.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Excellent

The film centers Middle Eastern and non-Anglo-Saxon contexts. It utilizes a diverse array of scholars to challenge the homogeneity of Western historical media.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The narrative critiques Western institutional biases and post-colonialist power structures. It emphasizes a sophisticated deconstruction of traditional Western historiography.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no discernible focus on visible or invisible disabilities. The film does not address neurodivergence or the lived experiences of disabled individuals.

Strengths

  • Strongly challenges Western-centric historical narratives and Orientalist frameworks.
  • Provides a multi-vocal perspective through a diverse array of scholars.
  • Prioritizes the agency of non-Western historical figures and contexts.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks representation of LGBTQ+ identities or queer historical narratives.
  • Provides minimal agency-driven narratives regarding gender and women's roles.
  • Contains no focus on disability or neurodivergent lived experiences.

AI Analysis

Islam: The Untold Story acts as a historiographical intervention that challenges Eurocentric academic hierarchies. It succeeds by prioritizing non-Western historical figures and multi-vocal scholarly perspectives, effectively disrupting the 'Western observer' trope. The film's strength lies in its cultural and racial deconstruction. By framing Western history as potentially biased, it aligns with post-colonialist critiques and empowers marginalized historical perspectives. However, the documentary's diversity is limited by its narrow historical scope. The absence of LGBTQ+ and disability representation significantly lowers the overall score, despite the film's intellectual depth regarding cultural identity.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.