New Showbiz

You are here:
Let's Go

Let's Go

1937

Approved

Director

Arthur Davis

Runtime

7 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

One of the it-takes-a-villageism cartoons with a message in which a happy-and-prosperous village of honeybees goes to the aid of a village of starving grasshoppers, by dropping honey bombs and food to the stricken bug community. Prosperity returns and all the world citizens are happy again. Although, in the real world it was usually the grasshoppers and locusts that caused most of the famine problems to begin with, and didn't leave anything for the bees to make honey from.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

3.6/10

Limited

Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film lacks any evidence of non-cisnormative identities or same-sex intimacy. The focus remains strictly on communal insect interactions.

Gender Representation

Fair

Character roles appear to follow traditional 1930s social structures. There is no indication of subversive gendered power dynamics or unique arcs.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

Species serve as allegorical proxies for socioeconomic disparity between bees and grasshoppers. The film maintains a traditional provider and recipient dynamic.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The story promotes communal altruism by showing prosperous bees aiding starving grasshoppers. However, it avoids systemic critiques in favor of a restorative moral conclusion.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no information available regarding the depiction of physical or neurodivergent traits in this animation.

Strengths

  • Promotes themes of communal altruism and collective aid.
  • Disrupts 'survival of the fittest' tropes through inter-species cooperation.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks complex, intersectional agency or systemic critique of resource scarcity.
  • Relies on simplified provider-recipient dynamics rather than exploring deeper social nuances.

AI Analysis

Let's Go (1937) functions as a moralizing fable centered on inter-community aid. While it moves away from individualist competition by highlighting collective support, the narrative remains rooted in the conventional social frameworks of its era. The film uses insect species to mirror socioeconomic differences, yet it fails to challenge the underlying causes of scarcity. Instead, it offers a simplified, harmonious resolution that restores a status quo of prosperity. Ultimately, the short lacks the intersectional depth or systemic critique necessary to move beyond a standard mid-century animated trope.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.