The Case of the Black Cat
1936
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.2 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
The Case of the Howling Dog
1934
ApprovedDirector
Alan Crosland
Runtime
74 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
A very nervous man named Cartwright comes into Perry's office to have the neighbor arrested for his howling dog. He states that the howling is a sign that there is a death in the neighborhood. He also wants a will written giving his estate to the lady living at the neighbors house. It is all very mysterious and by the next day, his will is changed and Cartwright is missing, as is the lady of the house next door. Perry has a will and a retainer and must find out whether he has a client or a beneficiary.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
1.8/10
Minimal
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film adheres to the heteronormative social structures typical of 1930s crime cinema. There is no evidence of same-sex intimacy or non-cisnormative identities within the mystery.
Gender Representation
The story centers on male characters, including the protagonist and the client. While a woman is central to the plot, her role is defined by her relationship to men and inheritance.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The narrative lacks visible intersectional representation or characters of color with high agency. It appears to reflect the homogeneous casting norms of the early sound era.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The plot reinforces conventional views of capitalism and legal order through disputes over wills and estates. It operates strictly within traditional Western social institutions.
Disability Representation
The film provides no information regarding characters with visible or invisible disabilities. No instances of neurodivergence or physical disability are mentioned in the narrative.
Strengths
- The film provides a clear, structured mystery centered on legal and property disputes.
Areas for Improvement
- The narrative lacks diverse casting and fails to include non-cisnormative identities.
- Female characters lack independent agency, appearing primarily as beneficiaries or relatives.
- The story lacks intersectional representation, adhering to the homogeneous norms of its era.
AI Analysis
The film is a standard genre piece that prioritizes established mystery tropes over social commentary. It functions as a product of the 1930s studio system, focusing on property disputes and legalistic resolutions. Representation is minimal, with the narrative architecture favoring traditional hierarchies. The characters and themes reflect the era's mainstream social norms rather than any attempt to subvert them.
Similar Movies
The Canary Murder Case
1929
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.3 out of 10
Calling Philo Vance
1940
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.8 out of 10
The Kennel Murder Case
1933
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.5 out of 10
The Mystery of the 13th Guest
1943
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.3 out of 10
The Return of the Whistler
1948
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.8 out of 10
Muss 'em Up
1936
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.5 out of 10
The Phantom of Crestwood
1932
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.4 out of 10
Cecile Is Dead
1944
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.2 out of 10
Whispering Smith vs. Scotland Yard
1952
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.6 out of 10
The Donovan Affair
1929
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.5 out of 10
So Dark the Night
1946
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.2 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.