
The Sin of Jesus
1961

1962
Director
Anselmo Duarte
Runtime
98 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Zé is a very poor man whose most prized possession is his donkey. When his donkey falls terminally ill, Zé makes a promise to Saint Bárbara: If his donkey recovers, he will carry a cross - like Jesus - all the way from his city to Saint Bárbara's church, in the state capital. Upon the recovery of his donkey, Zé leaves on his journey. He makes it to the church, but the priest refuses to accept the cross once he discovers the context of Zé's promise.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks LGBTQ+ characters or narratives addressing non-cisnormative identities. The story focuses entirely on a singular protagonist's spiritual and physical journey.
Gender Representation
The narrative centers on a male protagonist and his struggle against a patriarchal religious hierarchy. There is no evidence of female agency or subversion of gendered leadership.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
As a Brazilian production, the film exists within a non-Anglo-Saxon context. The focus on a very poor man suggests class-based identities that often intersect with racial dynamics.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film critiques the rigidity of organized religion by depicting a protagonist rejected by the institutional Church. It frames religious institutions as obstacles to genuine faith.
Disability Representation
There is no evidence regarding the depiction of physical or neurodivergent disabilities. The donkey's illness serves as the primary plot catalyst rather than human disability.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Anselmo Duarte’s drama is a focused study of individual faith versus institutional dogma. It excels at using a spiritual journey to critique the rigidity of established religious hierarchies, offering a sophisticated look at systemic friction. However, the film lacks demographic breadth. The narrative is heavily centered on a male protagonist, and the absence of diverse gendered or LGBTQ+ perspectives limits its intersectional depth. Ultimately, the film is a social realist critique of authority rather than a diverse ensemble piece. It prioritizes thematic subversion of religious institutions over broad representation.

1961

2002

1970

2021

1961

1978

1978

1967

1987

1982

1986

1999
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.