You are here:

Touch of Death

Touch of Death

Representation Score

3.0/10

Limited

1988

Unrated

Director

Lucio Fulci

Runtime

86 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Touch of Death is a traditional 1980s slasher film that prioritizes genre-specific thrills over social commentary. The narrative centers on a cannibalistic antagonist and a copycat killer, operating within conservative cinematic boundaries. The film relies heavily on established clichés, such as the predatory male and the female victim. It does not intentionally represent diverse identities, focusing instead on themes of deception and paranoia. Ultimately, the work functions as a standard exploration of violence. It does not attempt to challenge social, gender, or racial hierarchies, remaining firmly rooted in the conventions of its era.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Touch of Death have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film follows conventional assumptions that everyone is straight or cisgender. It does not include any non-straight or non-cisgender identities or give these characters significant roles.

How does Touch of Death portray gender?

Limited

Female characters mainly serve as targets of violence or objects of predatory schemes. The film reinforces the cliché of the predatory male figure without challenging gender hierarchies.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Touch of Death?

Limited

Casting follows typical Western European cinematic standards of the 1980s. There is no significant evidence of diverse casts or actors playing roles traditionally associated with different races.

How does Touch of Death represent religion and culture?

Limited

The narrative presents a cynical view of social interactions through a get-rich-quick scheme. It focuses on psychopathy rather than critiquing institutions or capitalism.

Does Touch of Death include disability representation?

Minimal

Characters with visible or invisible disabilities are not given significant roles. Physical trauma is used as a plot device rather than exploring their lived experiences.

Present on Screen

  • The film offers a cynical critique of interpersonal trust through its protagonist's deceptive schemes.

Limited or Absent

  • The film lacks representation of LGBTQ+ identities and non-cisgender characters.
  • Gender dynamics rely on outdated clichés, casting women primarily as victims.
  • There is a notable absence of racial and ethnic diversity in the casting.
  • The narrative fails to provide ability to act or meaningful representation for characters with disabilities.

Official Synopsis

The financially strained and increasingly desperate, Lester Parsons concocts a brilliant get-rich-quick scheme; cruise the lonely hearts ads for rich women to fleece. Too bad then, that Lester’s also a psychotic cannibal who enjoys mutilating these lovelorn souls, via his trusty chainsaw, and using their flesh for his dinner. When a copycat killer threatens to bring him down, Lester must do all he can to prevent this new killer’s sloppy work from ruining them both.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.