New Showbiz

You are here:
Planetarium

Planetarium

2016

Not Rated

Director

Rebecca Zlotowski

Runtime

105 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

In 1930s France, two sisters who are thought to be able to communicate with ghosts meet a visionary producer while performing in Paris.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.9/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The story centers on a heteronormative romantic connection between Camille and David. It lacks explicit queer narratives or non-cisnormative character arcs.

Gender Representation

Good

Camille possesses significant emotional agency, avoiding submissive tropes. The film deconstructs traditional hierarchies by presenting the male lead as a figure of emotional fluctuation.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The cast focuses on a homogenous group of young adults in an urban French setting. It avoids harmful stereotypes but lacks significant ethnic breadth.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The film embraces postmodern moral relativism and subjective truth. It prioritizes individual emotional experience over traditional institutional or moral guidance.

Disability Representation

Fair

The narrative focuses strictly on the psychological states of the protagonists. There is no central depiction of physical or neurodivergent disabilities.

Strengths

  • Subverts traditional gender hierarchies through Camille's emotional agency.
  • Challenges masculine competence by presenting a fluid, drifting male protagonist.
  • Embraces a postmodern worldview that prioritizes individual experience over rigid social structures.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks explicit LGBTQ+ character arcs or queer narratives.
  • Features a homogenous social circle with limited racial and ethnic breadth.
  • Provides no significant representation of physical or neurodivergent disabilities.

AI Analysis

Planetarium succeeds as a character study that subverts traditional gender roles. By presenting Camille with agency and David with emotional instability, the film avoids standard masculine and feminine archetypes. However, the film remains narrow in its social scope. It lacks meaningful representation across LGBTQ+, racial, and disability categories, focusing instead on a localized, homogenous group of characters. Ultimately, the film's strength lies in its rejection of rigid social structures and its embrace of emotional fluidity, even if it fails to provide a diverse spectrum of identities.

How are these scores produced? →

Featured in

  • Best Religious & Cultural Representation in Film

Similar Movies

Movie poster for Ghost Walk

Ghost Walk

2019

No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.4 out of 10
Movie poster for Jonas

Jonas

2013

No user ratings available yet
No diversity score available

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.