You are here:
The Silly Bastard Next to the Bed

The Silly Bastard Next to the Bed

2014

PG-13

Director

Scott Calonico

Runtime

11 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

In 1963, President Kennedy recorded one of the most foul mouthed telephone calls ever made from the White House. This is the story of that phone call and the silly bastard who started it all.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

2.9/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film lacks any evidence of LGBTQ+ characters or themes. The narrative focuses on political history and specific interpersonal dialogue.

Gender Representation

Limited

The story centers on male political figures, specifically JFK and his interlocutor. It does not provide meaningful representation for women or subvert gender hierarchies through diverse casting.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The 1963 White House setting suggests a narrative centered on the era's existing power structures. The work appears to follow a traditional framework of Anglo-American political figures.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The documentary deconstructs Western institutions by highlighting an irreverent moment in the presidency. It disrupts the idealized image of the American Executive Branch through human fallibility.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no information available regarding the depiction of neurodivergence or physical disabilities in this documentary.

Strengths

  • Deconstructs the idealized, dignified myth of the American presidency.
  • Provides a humanizing look at historical figures through linguistic transgression.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks meaningful representation for women or diverse gender identities.
  • Fails to include LGBTQ+ themes or diverse racial and ethnic perspectives.
  • Focuses on a narrow, traditional Anglo-American political framework.

AI Analysis

The documentary focuses on a singular, transgressive historical event: a profane telephone exchange involving President John F. Kennedy in 1963. Because the narrative is built around this specific political moment, it lacks intersectional breadth. While the film succeeds in humanizing a high-profile political figure by stripping away presidential decorum, it does so through a narrow lens. The subject matter is inherently centered on male-dominated political history and traditional power structures. Ultimately, the film prioritizes the subversion of institutional dignity over the inclusion of marginalized identities, resulting in a low diversity profile.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.