You are here:

Shine, Shine, My Star

Shine, Shine, My Star

Representation Score

3.4/10

Limited

1969

PG-13

Director

Aleksandr Mitta

Runtime

94 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Shine, Shine, My Star offers a nuanced look at the human condition during a period of intense political upheaval. By centering on a comedian rather than a soldier, the film avoids the monolithic, state-driven narratives common to the era. While the film lacks contemporary markers of characters who reflect more than one aspect of diversity, such as LGBTQ+ or disability inclusion, it finds strength in its thematic complexity. It explores the tension between national self-determination and Bolshevism through a lens of individual ability to act. Ultimately, the film succeeds as a humanist study of art and social life, even if its demographic representation remains limited by the historical context of 1969 Soviet cinema.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Shine, Shine, My Star have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film does not include any LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. Instead, it focuses on the social and artistic tensions of the post-Revolutionary era.

How does Shine, Shine, My Star portray gender?

Fair

The story centers on Volodya, a comedian navigating social restructuring. While women's roles are not explicitly detailed, the focus on art suggests a departure from hyper-masculine themes.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Shine, Shine, My Star?

Fair

Set in 1920, the film touches on national self-determination. This thematic focus implies a preoccupation with the diverse ethnic identities struggling for autonomy during the Soviet transition.

How does Shine, Shine, My Star represent religion and culture?

Good

The narrative prioritizes everyday sorrows and art over didactic revolutionary propaganda. This approach favors a humanist, complex view of social change rather than rigid institutional dogmas.

Does Shine, Shine, My Star include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no documented evidence regarding the portrayal of physical or neurodivergent disabilities in this work.

Present on Screen

  • Prioritizes individual psychological depth and humanism over rigid ideological adherence.
  • Uses art as a mediator to explore complex social and moral relativism.
  • Avoids hyper-masculine clichés by focusing on the role of the artist in society.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-straight relationships.
  • Provides no documented evidence of disability representation.
  • Women's roles are not explicitly detailed within the central narrative structure.

Official Synopsis

In 1920, just 3 years after the October revolution, the peoples had to decide between conforming to Bolshevism or national self-determination. In that torn-apart-time, one man, the comedian Volodya, tries to mediate, not between different ideologies, but social life and art. While others just want to wash away their gloom, he reflects on the everyday sorrows and the role of art in that time of changes.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.