You are here:

Ono

Ono

Representation Score

4.2/10

Fair

1989

Director

Sergey Ovcharov

Runtime

124 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Ono is a work of profound political and systemic critique rather than a study in demographic representation. It uses grotesque imagery to deconstruct state authority and repetitive institutional tyranny. The film's strength lies in its aggressive subversion of political structures and historical revisionism. It prioritizes systemic commentary over a diverse range of individual character identities. Ultimately, the work serves as a satirical examination of the Russian state, favoring systemic commentary over a broad range of individual character identities.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Ono have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film does not include explicit LGBTQ+ characters or stories. Instead, it focuses on the bureaucratic system and political allegories, emphasizing systemic cycles over personal identity.

How does Ono portray gender?

Fair

The story centers around male-dominated political structures, depicting leaders as grotesque or incompetent but still highlighting the male-centric political authority.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Ono?

Limited

The film focuses on Russian history within a specific ethno-national framework. It lacks a multi-ethnic cast, concentrating instead on the internal political development of the state.

How does Ono represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The film critiques centralized power and institutional morality using satire. It disrupts traditional historical narratives and challenges established frameworks of governance.

Does Ono include disability representation?

Minimal

There are no characters with physical or neurodivergent disabilities in the film. The narrative focuses on macro-level political and historical themes rather than individual physical representation.

Present on Screen

  • Provides a sophisticated, non-Western critique of centralized power and institutional morality.
  • Uses grotesque imagery to effectively subvert traditional 'great man' historical narratives.
  • Offers a deep, cynical examination of systemic corruption and political cycles.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks representation of LGBTQ+ identities or narratives.
  • Focuses heavily on patriarchal structures of authority rather than gender diversity.
  • Operates within a narrow ethno-national framework centered on Russian history.

Official Synopsis

The bureaucratic epos on the dialogues and plots of Mikhail Saltykov-Shchedrin "The History of a Town". In a metaphorical and grotesque form, the film conveys the history of Russia from the calling of the Varangians until the end of the 20th century. The film traces the change of the “chiefs” of the county town of Glupov, which differ in varying degrees of tyranny and the corresponding total number of “killed” city residents. The heads of the city easily guess the former heads of the Russian state and the USSR.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.