You are here:

The Ugly Story

The Ugly Story

Representation Score

3.7/10

Limited

1966

Director

Vladimir Naumov, Aleksandr Alov

Runtime

102 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

The film is a sophisticated exploration of societal transitions that prioritize communal struggles over individual pursuits. It uses satire to critique historical social orders, replacing traditional individualism with a focus on the socio-political collective. While the film lacks modern markers of diversity such as LGBTQ+ or ethnic representation, it excels in cultural representation. It successfully deconstructs village hierarchies to highlight the evolving state and the communal farm. Ultimately, the film's strength lies in its narrative structure, which frames character's ability to drive the story through their relationship to a changing social framework rather than through individual or diverse identity markers.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does The Ugly Story have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film does not depict any non-binary gender identities or same-sex relationships. It focuses solely on the socio-political dynamics within a traditional framework.

How does The Ugly Story portray gender?

Fair

Women are shown as strong, resilient pillars of the community through their work and perseverance. Despite being confined to traditional 1960s rural roles, they play significant roles within the collective farm system.

How racially and ethnically diverse is The Ugly Story?

Fair

The casting reflects the ethnic demographics of the Soviet rural landscape during that time. The film portrays the Russian peasantry as a homogeneous group without introducing external hierarchies.

How does The Ugly Story represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The film highlights collectivist values and the dismantling of traditional religious hierarchies. It effectively illustrates the shift from agrarian life to a centralized, secular social order.

Does The Ugly Story include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no representation of characters with visible or invisible disabilities as central narrative drivers or subjects of representation.

Present on Screen

  • Strong cultural representation through the depiction of collectivist values and communal struggle.
  • Meaningful portrayal of women's ability to act and resilience within the rural labor system.
  • Effective use of satire to critique the transition from traditionalism to a centralized social order.

Limited or Absent

  • Complete absence of LGBTQ+ representation or non-traditional gender identities.
  • Lack of visible or invisible disability representation within the narrative.
  • Limited ethnic diversity, adhering strictly to a homogeneous portrayal of the Russian peasantry.

Official Synopsis

Based on a satirical short story by Fyodor Dostoyevsky concerning the escapades of a Russian civil servant.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.