
Killing Oswald
2013

2007
Director
Shane O'Sullivan
Runtime
139 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
A new investigative documentary exploring the controversies surrounding the assassination of Bobby Kennedy on June 5, 1968 as he looked set to challenge Nixon for the White House. Munir Sirhan tells how his brother Sirhan has never been able to remember the shooting. Sandra Serrano speaks for the first time in forty years about the girl in the polka-dot dress fleeing the scene, yelling "We shot him! We shot him!" And Dr. Herbert Spiegel of Columbia University describes how Sirhan was hypnotically programmed to kill Robert Kennedy.
Overall Score
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film focuses strictly on the political landscape and criminal investigation of 1968. There is no discernible presence of LGBTQ+ characters or engagement with queer identity.
Gender Representation
The narrative centers on male political figures and law enforcement. While Sandra Serrano provides a crucial female perspective, the structure remains focused on traditional masculine power dynamics.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
Archival footage reflects the racial demographics of the 1960s American political establishment. Munir Sirhan offers a non-Western perspective, but the focus remains on the Anglo-American context.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The documentary excels by critiquing traditional Western institutions and state-sanctioned truths. It investigates potential corruption within intelligence agencies and organized crime to disrupt official histories.
Disability Representation
Psychological states and hypnotic programming theories are explored through a forensic lens. The film lacks a nuanced exploration of neurodivergence or characters with lived experiences of disability.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
RFK Must Die is a historical deconstruction that prioritizes the interrogation of power over demographic breadth. It functions as a postmodern investigation into institutional truth rather than a vehicle for intersectional representation. The film's strength lies in its systemic critique of American political institutions. By questioning the official narratives provided by the state, it offers a complex view of institutional morality. However, the documentary lacks intentionality regarding identity-based categories. It remains bound by the historical constraints of the 1960s, resulting in low scores for gender, race, and LGBTQ+ representation.

2013

2010

2021

2013

1992

2010

2013

1997

2004

2015

1963

2013
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.