New Showbiz

You are here:
27: Gone Too Soon

27: Gone Too Soon

2018

Director

Simon Napier-Bell

Runtime

70 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Brian Jones, Jimi Hendrix, Janis Joplin and Jim Morrison all died at the age of 27 between 1969 and 1971. At the time, the coincidence gave rise to some comment, but it was not until the death of Kurt Cobain, about two and a half decades later, that the idea of a "27 Club" began to catch on in public perception, reignited with the death of Amy Winehouse in 2011. Through interviews with people who knew them, such as music stars, critics, medical experts and unseen footage, the lives, music, and artistry of those who died at 27 are investigated with a bid to find answers.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

5.0/10

Fair

Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

The film explores the counter-culture era, which was historically linked to fluid sexualities. However, the narrative focuses on musical legacies and tragic deaths rather than centering queer identity.

Gender Representation

Fair

Janis Joplin provides a vital counterpoint to the male-dominated rock hierarchy. While she is treated as an equal to her male peers, the film still leans into the male-centric 'rock god' trope.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

Jimi Hendrix serves as a significant anchor for racial diversity. The documentary explores the intersection of Black artistry and mainstream rock without making racial critique the central focus.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The film examines lives lived through intense social upheaval and rebellion. It critiques rigid mid-20th-century structures by focusing on the rejection of conventional domesticity and social stability.

Disability Representation

Limited

Mental health struggles and substance use are addressed as biographical facts. These elements are presented as tragic outcomes rather than exploring characters with agency navigating neurodivergence.

Strengths

  • Centering Janis Joplin disrupts the traditional male-dominated hierarchy of rock history.
  • The inclusion of Jimi Hendrix provides a significant anchor for racial diversity.
  • The film captures the essence of cultural rebellion and the rejection of social norms.

Areas for Improvement

  • The narrative remains heavily weighted toward the male-centric 'rock god' trope.
  • Mental health struggles are treated as tragic inevitabilities rather than active representation.
  • Queer identity is not utilized as a primary driver of the narrative architecture.

AI Analysis

The documentary functions as a biographical investigation into the '27 Club' phenomenon. It succeeds in disrupting traditional hierarchies by placing icons like Janis Joplin and Jimi Hendrix on equal footing with their male counterparts. However, the film's investigative nature limits its social impact. It treats sensitive topics like mental health and sexuality as historical context or tragic circumstances rather than central themes of identity or agency. Ultimately, while the subject matter inherently touches on social rebellion and diverse artistry, the narrative remains a study of musical tragedy rather than a progressive social commentary.

How are these scores produced? →

Similar Movies

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.