New Showbiz

You are here:
The Good Thief

The Good Thief

1980

Director

Pasquale Festa Campanile

Runtime

108 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Caleb, "son of nobody" (Enrico Montesano) lives in Galilee in Jesus' day and struggles as a thief and con-man, pretending to be a magician. When he witnesses Jesus turning water into wine, he thinks he's found a competitor. So Caleb goes on, convinced that Jesus is a fake just as he is, always trying to figure out his tricks. In the meantime, he gets involved with a prostitute (played by Edwige Fenech), but also with the wife of a Roman patrician (played by the equally alluring Bernadette Lafont), he steals a few goats and cons a few people, he befriends a lovable dog and gets in trouble with some Roman soldiers.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.3/10

Fair

Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film focuses on heteronormative romantic entanglements. There is no evidence of non-cisnormative gender identities or narratives designed to critique heteronormativity.

Gender Representation

Fair

Female characters occupy roles that challenge submissive archetypes by operating on society's fringes. However, the narrative remains centered on the male protagonist's perspective.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The period setting implies a diverse historical landscape, but the cast follows standard 1980s European casting conventions. There is no evidence of intentional non-white protagonist representation.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The film deconstructs religious authority by framing miracles as mere tricks. It prioritizes a skeptical, secular worldview over traditional religious dogma.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no discernible focus on physical or neurodivergent disabilities within the narrative.

Strengths

  • The narrative effectively deconstructs religious authority through a skeptical, secular lens.
  • Female characters challenge traditional submissive archetypes by operating within social fringes.
  • The film offers a unique, irreverent take on moral structures and religious dogma.

Areas for Improvement

  • The film lacks representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisnormative narratives.
  • The narrative remains heavily centered on a male protagonist's perspective.
  • Racial representation follows standard 1980s European casting without disrupting the historical status quo.

AI Analysis

The film is a subversive comedy that uses a cynical, anti-authoritarian protagonist to challenge religious sanctity. It succeeds in deconstructing institutional authority by treating the miraculous through a lens of skepticism and moral relativism. However, the film lacks intersectional depth. It relies on traditional heteronormative structures and follows the standard casting conventions of its era, offering little in the way of racial or LGBTQ+ diversity. Ultimately, the work's strength lies in its secular, morally ambiguous exploration of human deception rather than its social representation.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.