
Miss Impossible
2017

2016
Director
Marc Fitoussi
Runtime
110 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Do we really know our parents? Fourteen-year-old Anouk suddenly discovers another side to her mother during an observation workshop that she carries out in the insurance company where her mother works. An immersion week in the company's adult world, with its little compromises and many cowardly acts, which soon put a seal on her young life. Between an initiation, rift, and assuming responsibility for the first time, the experience is a form of adieu to childhood.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film maintains a neutral baseline regarding queer identities. While the narrative explores adult compromises, it lacks explicit depictions of LGBTQ+ characters or romantic pairings.
Gender Representation
Women drive the film's emotional and intellectual core through the protagonist and her mother. The story subverts maternal archetypes by showing femininity within flawed professional hierarchies.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The setting focuses on a specific French corporate social stratum. There is no clear evidence of a multi-ethnic cast, suggesting a focus on class over ethnic diversity.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film adopts a skeptical view of corporate capitalism and traditional authority. It favors a realistic, cynical worldview over idealized family structures and social norms.
Disability Representation
There is no visible representation of physical or neurodivergent disabilities. The score reflects a neutral stance due to the absence of such characters.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Mum Is Wrong functions as a sophisticated coming-of-age drama that dismantles the idealized perception of parental authority. By placing a fourteen-year-old girl in a corporate insurance setting, the film shifts from domestic tropes to a critique of professional ethics and adult compromise. The narrative succeeds in deconstructing the 'perfect parent' archetype, offering a nuanced look at how institutional environments shape character. It prioritizes psychological complexity and systemic critique over traditional moralism. However, the film's focus on a specific social and professional class limits its broader demographic reach. While it excels at subverting gendered expectations, it lacks explicit evidence of diverse racial or LGBTQ+ representation.

2017

2015

2015

2008

2018

2012

2019

2018

2012

1969

2016

2014
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.