Youth in Fury
1960
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.7 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
R.P.M.
1970
RDirector
Stanley Kramer
Runtime
92 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
R.P.M. stands for (political) revolutions per minute. Anthony Quinn plays a liberal college professor at a west coast college during the hedy days of campus activism in the late 1960s. Radical students take over the college, the president resigns, and Quinn's character, who has always been a champion of student activism, is appointed president. As the students continue to push the envelope of revolution, Quinn's character is faced with the challenge of restoring order or abetting the descent into anarchy.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
3.3/10
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film focuses on ideological conflicts between students and administration. It lacks non-cisnormative identities and adheres to the heteronormative social structures of 1970.
Gender Representation
Agency is concentrated in male characters, specifically the professor and student radicals. There is little evidence of female intellect or the subversion of traditional masculinity.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The narrative prioritizes the generational gap over multi-ethnic representation. It lacks significant evidence of intersectional casting or non-white protagonists driving the story.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film critiques Western institutions by exploring the collapse of university authority. It engages deeply with the friction between established order and radical revolution.
Disability Representation
There is no evidence of characters with visible or invisible disabilities possessing agency within the narrative.
Strengths
- Strong critique of traditional Western institutional authority and systemic stability.
- Engages meaningfully with the sociopolitical frictions and radicalism of the era.
Areas for Improvement
- Lacks intersectional breadth regarding race, gender, and LGBTQ+ identities.
- Fails to provide agency to female characters or individuals with disabilities.
- Relies on a demographic composition typical of 1960s campus dramas.
AI Analysis
R.P.M. serves as a period-specific study of institutional volatility and the breakdown of authority during the late 1960s. It excels at critiquing the stability of Western academic structures through the lens of student activism and political revolution. However, the film lacks intersectional breadth. The narrative is heavily centered on male figures and fails to integrate diverse racial, gender, or LGBTQ+ identities into its core conflict. Ultimately, the film functions as a sociopolitical drama about the generation gap rather than a modern exercise in demographic representation.
Similar Movies
Student Gerber
1981
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.6 out of 10
El impostor
1960
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.6 out of 10
The Revolutionary
1970
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.6 out of 10
Liberty Belle
1983
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.8 out of 10
The Confrontation
1969
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.3 out of 10
Young Cassidy
1965
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.2 out of 10
The Explosive Generation
1961
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.1 out of 10
The Brave Warrior
1968
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.6 out of 10
Porca società
1978
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.5 out of 10
Advise & Consent
1962
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.8 out of 10
The Comedians
1967
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.2 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.