You are here:

The Greater Good

Name: The Greater Good
Director: Kendall Nelson, Chris Pilaro
Released: 2011
Duration: 84 min

Representation Score

7.3/10

Good

2011

Director

Kendall Nelson, Chris Pilaro

Runtime

84 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

The Greater Good functions as a sociological and scientific exploration into the polarization of public health. It prioritizes deconstructing the hype and politics surrounding vaccine efficacy over explicit identity politics. The film's strength lies in its attempt to dismantle dogmatic rhetoric. By seeking a rational middle ground, it encourages a nuanced view of systemic institutional issues. However, the documentary remains focused on the medical debate rather than broader social identity explorations.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does The Greater Good have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film focuses on medical and political debates about vaccine efficacy. There are no identified LGBTQ+ characters or narratives exploring non-straight relationships.

How does The Greater Good portray gender?

Fair

The documentary highlights individual family experiences using a verité style. The narrative structure centers on scientific discussions without delving into gender power dynamics or hierarchies.

How racially and ethnically diverse is The Greater Good?

Fair

The scope centers on the American vaccine debate and public health programs. The context does not confirm specific instances of diverse casting or a non-white majority.

How does The Greater Good represent religion and culture?

Good

The film challenges traditional institutional narratives by framing the vaccine debate through fear and politics. It seeks to reframe the debate by moving past emotionally charged camps.

Does The Greater Good include disability representation?

Good

The subject matter suggests representation involving neurodivergence or chronic illness. Individuals are given real power through personal stories about how their lives were affected by health choices.

Present on Screen

Encourages a nuanced view of public health by dismantling polarized rhetoric.
Reframes the vaccine debate by moving past emotionally charged camps.
Provides real power to individuals navigating complex health realities through personal stories.

Limited or Absent

Does not explicitly engage with identity politics or social hierarchy subversion.
Does not provide specific evidence of diverse casting or demographic representation.
Does not explore non-straight relationships or gendered power dynamics.

Official Synopsis

The film looks behind the fear, hype and politics that polarize people into emotionally charged pro-vaccine or anti-vaccine camps with no room for middle ground. Verite stories of individuals and their families, whose lives have been forever changed by vaccine choices, interwoven with interviews from leading experts in the field, will re-frame the vaccine debate and offer, for the first time, the opportunity to have a rational, scientific and factual discussion on how to create a more effective vaccine program in America today.

How are these scores produced? →