
Belly of the Beast
2020

2013
PG-13Director
Lana Wilson, Martha Shane
Runtime
85 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Since the assassination of Dr. George Tiller in Kansas in 2009, only four doctors in the United States continue to perform third-trimester abortions. These physicians, all colleagues of Dr. Tiller, sacrifice their safety and personal lives in the name of their fierce, unwavering conviction to help women.
Overall Score
Good
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film approaches reproductive rights through an intersectional lens that moves beyond heteronormative medical frameworks. It frames bodily autonomy as a universal necessity for diverse lived experiences.
Gender Representation
Women are centered in high-stakes, professional roles, emphasizing their agency and intellectual rigor. The narrative portrays reproductive autonomy as a direct challenge to patriarchal control.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
A diverse array of healthcare providers and patients provides a nuanced view of healthcare access. The film acknowledges systemic barriers that disproportionately affect marginalized communities.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The documentary critiques the friction between secular medical ethics and oppressive religious or political structures. It prioritizes subjective morality and reproductive justice over traditionalist frameworks.
Disability Representation
The film touches on the logistical and physical complexities of accessing healthcare. However, specific depictions of neurodivergence or visible disability are not primary narrative drivers.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
After Tiller is a sophisticated examination of identity-based power dynamics and systemic constraints. It succeeds by centering female agency and deconstructing traditional institutional authority through the lens of medical professionals fighting for bodily autonomy. The film excels in its portrayal of gender and cultural critique, positioning the struggle for healthcare as a rebellion against patriarchal and religious hierarchies. This intentionality creates a powerful narrative of individual and collective empowerment. While the film provides a nuanced view of intersectional justice, it remains primarily a character study of specific clinicians. This focus limits the depth of representation for specific disabilities and neurodivergent experiences.

2020

2013

2020

1968

2014

2016

2015

2013
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.