You are here:
The Coming War on China

The Coming War on China

2016

TV-PG

Director

John Pilger

Runtime

110 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

John Pilger reveals what the news doesn't - that the United States and the world's second economic power, China (both nuclear armed) are on the road to war. Pilger's film is a warning and an inspiring story of resistance.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

5.9/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The documentary does not center on LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisnormative gender narratives. The focus on macro-geopolitics and military strategy results in a lack of visibility for these specific identities.

Gender Representation

Fair

The narrative architecture defaults to masculine-coded subjects like state actors and military commanders. It does not actively seek to subvert gender hierarchies or center female leadership.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Excellent

The film excels by centering the perspectives of Pacific Island leaders, activists, and indigenous residents. This shifts agency away from Western superpowers toward those directly impacted by geopolitical maneuvers.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

Utilizing a post-colonial lens, the film critiques Western institutions and military expansion. It portrays Western structures as sources of regional instability rather than guardians of order.

Disability Representation

Fair

There is no significant focus on visible or invisible disabilities. Subjects are primarily engaged in political activism rather than narratives involving disability.

Strengths

  • Disrupts Anglo-centric media narratives by centering Pacific Island leaders and indigenous residents.
  • Provides high agency to marginalized populations in the Asia-Pacific region.
  • Uses a strong post-colonial lens to critique Western military and political structures.
  • Challenges traditional institutional tropes by prioritizing local autonomy and systemic critique.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks visibility for LGBTQ+ identities and non-cisnormative gender narratives.
  • Defaults to masculine-coded subjects like military commanders and state actors.
  • Does not actively center female leadership or subvert gender hierarchies.
  • Provides no significant focus on visible or invisible disabilities.

AI Analysis

John Pilger’s documentary serves as a powerful piece of counter-hegemonic media. It succeeds by disrupting Anglo-centric narratives and shifting the locus of agency from Western superpowers to the diverse ethnic groups of the Pacific. While the film lacks intersectional focus regarding gender and LGBTQ+ identities, it provides immense value through its deconstruction of imperialist frameworks. It prioritizes post-colonial perspectives over traditional Western stability. Ultimately, the work is defined by its ability to challenge institutional hierarchies by highlighting the voices of marginalized populations in the Asia-Pacific region.

How are these scores produced? →

Similar Movies

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.