
Yoksul
1986

1985
Director
Nesli Çölgeçen
Runtime
101 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
The landowner (Agha) of the Haraptar village marries off his old father with the young and beautiful Kiraz. But on the nuptial night, his father dies and everything starts to go bad for the Agha. Due to the long drought and provocations of Kekec Salman (big brother of Kiraz), the peasants steal the crops and run away to Istanbul. Without the peasants and crops, Agha is also forced to sell the village and move to Istanbul. But he cannot keep up with the big city life and consumes all his money and belongings. Agha's wife and relatives leave him during this downfall.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film follows a conventional heteronormative framework centered on a traditional marriage arrangement. There is no evidence of LGBTQ+ characters or non-heteronormative narratives within the plot.
Gender Representation
While Kiraz is a central figure, her agency is largely tied to the marital arrangements of men. The story focuses on the collapse of the patriarchal 'strongman' archetype.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The narrative explores social stratification and the tension between rural peasants and urban centers. It functions as a study of regional identity and class rather than racial diversity.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film offers a strong critique of class-based power and the decline of landed aristocracy. It portrays the fragility of traditional village systems and modern economic structures.
Disability Representation
There are no visible or invisible disabilities depicted that impact the narrative arc of the characters.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
The film serves as a social drama that deconstructs traditional hierarchies and the erosion of feudal structures. It focuses heavily on the friction between agrarian life and modernization through the lens of class struggle. While the film lacks identity-based representation regarding LGBTQ+ or disability, it provides a nuanced look at social stratification. The movement of the peasantry against the landowner class offers a compelling study of collective agency. Ultimately, the work excels at critiquing established social institutions and the instability of traditional power, even as it remains rooted in conventional gender and social frameworks.

1986

1979

2008

1988

2014

1954

2019

1987

2001

2018

2004

2016
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.