You are here:

Thank You Jesus for the Eternal Present

Name: Thank You Jesus for the Eternal Present
Director: Owen Land
Released: 1973
Duration: 6 min

Representation Score

5.5/10

Fair

1973

Director

Owen Land

Runtime

6 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Owen Land’s experimental collage avoids traditional storytelling in favor of a symbolic montage. The film's strength lies in its structural critique of Western hierarchies, using juxtaposition to question consumerism and religious institutions. However, the film lacks explicit, character-driven representation. Since it avoids linear plots and dialogue, it can't provide specific visibility for LGBTQ+ or racial identities. Ultimately, the film serves as a formal critique of societal structures rather than a vehicle for identity-based storytelling.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Thank You Jesus for the Eternal Present have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film doesn't include explicit LGBTQ+ characters or stories. Its fragmented, non-linear structure offers a unique viewing experience but doesn't represent specific LGBTQ+ identities.

How does Thank You Jesus for the Eternal Present portray gender?

Fair

The film challenges traditional gender roles by showing women in both spiritual and commercial settings. This placement questions the usual objectification of women.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Thank You Jesus for the Eternal Present?

Fair

Specific racial demographics aren't mentioned. However, the New York setting suggests a mix of cultures might be represented in the film's random montage.

How does Thank You Jesus for the Eternal Present represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The film challenges cultural norms by mixing prayer with consumerism. This montage breaks down the distinction between sacred spiritual values and commercial structures.

Does Thank You Jesus for the Eternal Present include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no evidence of the portrayal of physical or neurodivergent disabilities in this film.

Present on Screen

Effectively challenges traditional Western narrative hierarchies through avant-garde montage.
Strong critique of consumerist structures by juxtaposing spiritual imagery with commercialism.
Questions the traditional male gaze by placing women in diverse, non-cohesive contexts.

Limited or Absent

Lack of explicit LGBTQ+ representation or identity-based narratives.
Absence of documented racial or ethnic diversity within the visual subjects.
No identifiable representation of physical or neurodivergent disabilities.

Official Synopsis

A rapturous audio-visual mix that “deliberately seeks a hidden order in randomness.” The film combines the face of a woman in ecstatic, contemplative prayer with shots of an animal rights activist, and a scantily clad model advertising Russian cars at the International Auto Show, New York. - Harvard Film Archive

How are these scores produced? →