You are here:
Three Times Ana

Three Times Ana

1961

Director

David José Kohon

Runtime

115 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Three different love-related stories -all starring María Vaner as different "Anas". In "The Earth," Ana is a young and idealistic woman on the verge of adulthood when her first relationship with a clerk shatters her dreams of a romantic life. In "The Air," Ana is a rebellious, easy-living type among some beach bums whose sexual leanings tend to tip the scale at active promiscuity. In "The Cloud," Ana only exists in the imagination of an introverted man, who dreams of his ideal woman.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.8/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

The film lacks explicit queer visibility or non-heteronormative characters. While 'The Air' explores sexual fluidity and promiscuity, the focus remains on heterosexual romantic disillusionment.

Gender Representation

Good

The triptych format centers female subjectivity and agency. By exploring the 'Anas' as protagonists of their own emotional landscapes, the film subverts traditional patriarchal hierarchies.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

Casting appears largely homogeneous, reflecting the demographic norms of the 1961 Argentine middle class. There is no evidence of significant racial blending or non-white casting.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The narrative prioritizes existentialist values and individual psychology over religious dogma. It explores urban alienation as a critique of traditional Western social structures.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no discernible evidence regarding the representation of physical or neurodivergent disabilities in this work.

Strengths

  • Centering female subjectivity and agency through three distinct protagonists.
  • Subverting traditional gender hierarchies and romanticized female archetypes.
  • Exploring complex psychological states and existentialist themes.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lack of explicit LGBTQ+ visibility or non-heteronormative identities.
  • Homogeneous casting that reflects limited racial and ethnic diversity.
  • Absence of representation for physical or neurodivergent disabilities.

AI Analysis

David José Kohon’s modernist character study succeeds by prioritizing female agency and psychological depth. The film's structure allows for a nuanced exploration of women's desires and disillusionment, moving beyond mere objects of the male gaze. However, the work is limited by the demographic constraints of its 1961 production context. The casting is largely homogeneous, and the film lacks explicit LGBTQ+ representation, which moderates its progressive impact. Ultimately, the film is a significant text for its era, using a secular, existentialist lens to challenge traditional social and gendered archetypes through its focus on urban alienation.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.