You are here:

Twist Again in Moscow

Name: Twist Again in Moscow
Director: Jean-Marie Poiré
Released: 1986
Duration: 89 min

Representation Score

3.9/10

Limited

1986

Director

Jean-Marie Poiré

Runtime

89 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Twist Again in Moscow is a character-driven comedy that excels in critiquing institutional authority. By focusing on a protagonist navigating corruption and bureaucracy, the film provides a satirical look at systemic rigidity. However, the film's diversity is limited by its narrow demographic focus. Central tensions are driven almost exclusively by male characters, and the cast lacks significant racial or ethnic variety. The narrative relies on traditional archetypes rather than representing multiple aspects of identity. Ultimately, the film succeeds as a critique of power but falls short in providing a broad spectrum of identity-based representation.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Twist Again in Moscow have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film does not include any explicitly LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. It focuses on traditional family and personal conflicts typical of 1980s comedies.

How does Twist Again in Moscow portray gender?

Fair

The plot revolves around male-driven conflicts between the hotel manager and an auditor. Despite having female actors in the cast, the central roles remain with male characters.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Twist Again in Moscow?

Limited

The narrative and cast appear to be predominantly Eurocentric. The film reflects a specific French cultural perspective set in the Soviet Union without showing a diverse cast.

How does Twist Again in Moscow represent religion and culture?

Good

The film offers a sharp critique of institutional power. It uses Soviet bureaucracy and systemic corruption as comedic tools to challenge state-imposed morality.

Does Twist Again in Moscow include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no mention of characters with visible or invisible disabilities. The narrative does not feature any character arcs related to disability.

Present on Screen

Provides a clever critique of institutional power and systemic corruption.
Uses situational irony to subvert the authority of state bureaucracies.

Limited or Absent

Central plot tension lacks significant roles for female characters.
Minimal racial and ethnic diversity in the cast and setting.
No representation for LGBTQ+ identities or characters with disabilities.

Official Synopsis

Igor, who manages a fancy hotel and is on the take, has to juggle several problems at once. He has a two-hour window to get his ill-got gain out of the hotel, he must misdirect and obstruct the inquiries of a Party auditor who suspects that all is not above board, and he must keep out of sight and out of trouble his interloping and troublesome young brother-in-law, who arrives unannounced with barrels of rotten herring.

How are these scores produced? →