
Racing for Time
2008

1999
TV-PGDirector
Steve James
Runtime
100 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
A true story of a priest (Andre Braugher) in New Orleans who formed a group of black players and challenged an all-white prep school basketball team in the 1960's. Eventually events like these signaled the pivotal turn in the games' history leading to the integration in today's sport. Directed by Steve James (Hoop Dreams), these basketball players didn't just make shots, they made history.
Overall Score
Good
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film focuses on racial integration and religious leadership in 1960s New Orleans. There is no explicit evidence of LGBTQ+ character arcs or non-cisnormative identities within the narrative.
Gender Representation
The story centers on male-dominated spheres, specifically the priesthood and competitive athletics. It does not indicate a significant subversion of gender hierarchies or the presence of female protagonists.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The narrative actively deconstructs racial hegemony by centering a Black protagonist and athletes. It uses the basketball court as a space to challenge systemic segregation and racial status quo.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film portrays religious institutions as potential vehicles for social justice rather than static enforcers. It frames the all-white prep school system as a barrier to progress.
Disability Representation
The provided context offers no specific information regarding the depiction of physical or neurodivergent disabilities.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Passing Glory is a historical drama centered on the disruption of racial hegemony in 1960s New Orleans. By focusing on a Black priest and his team challenging an all-white institution, the film positions characters of color as the primary agents of social change. The narrative excels in its portrayal of racial agency and the dismantling of segregated hierarchies. It uses the intersection of religion and sports to critique systemic barriers and institutional structures. However, the film remains largely confined to traditional masculine spheres. The lack of visible gender diversity or LGBTQ+ representation suggests a narrow focus on the racial and religious dimensions of the era.

2008

2016

2000

2006

1990

1981

1996

1978
1988

1991

2002

2002
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.