You are here:

Easy Riders, Raging Bulls: How the Sex 'n' Drugs 'n' Rock 'n' Roll Generation Saved Hollywood

Name: Easy Riders, Raging Bulls: How the Sex 'n' Drugs 'n' Rock 'n' Roll Generation Saved Hollywood
Director: Kenneth Bowser
Released: 2003
Duration: 119 min

Representation Score

4.5/10

Fair

2003

TV-14

Director

Kenneth Bowser

Runtime

119 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

This documentary provides a historical overview of the 1970s 'New Hollywood' era, capturing a period of creative experimentation and the shifting dynamics within the film industry. However, the film's perspective is deeply rooted in the demographics of that specific time. The narrative highlights the achievements of a predominantly white, male establishment. While it effectively documents the shift towards gritty, realistic storytelling and the breakdown of traditional censorship, it does not challenge the existing industry hierarchies. Ultimately, the film reflects the historical reality of the era's leadership, focusing on the creative revolution that was centered around a narrow demographic of powerful figures.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Easy Riders, Raging Bulls: How the Sex 'n' Drugs 'n' Rock 'n' Roll Generation Saved Hollywood have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film focuses on a group of filmmakers from the 1970s who were primarily straight and cisgender. It mentions the sexual revolution but does not delve into LGBTQ+ identities or non-traditional gender expressions.

How does Easy Riders, Raging Bulls: How the Sex 'n' Drugs 'n' Rock 'n' Roll Generation Saved Hollywood portray gender?

Limited

The narrative centers on male directors such as Francis Ford Coppola and Martin Scorsese, reflecting the era's emphasis on masculine leadership in the film industry.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Easy Riders, Raging Bulls: How the Sex 'n' Drugs 'n' Rock 'n' Roll Generation Saved Hollywood?

Limited

The film primarily focuses on the white, Anglo-Saxon demographic that held significant power during the 1970s. It does not examine the impact of racial diversity or its absence on the industry's development.

How does Easy Riders, Raging Bulls: How the Sex 'n' Drugs 'n' Rock 'n' Roll Generation Saved Hollywood represent religion and culture?

Fair

The documentary explores the decline of traditional Western institutions and the rise of anti-establishment sentiments. It maintains a journalistic distance from the moral relativism it depicts.

Does Easy Riders, Raging Bulls: How the Sex 'n' Drugs 'n' Rock 'n' Roll Generation Saved Hollywood include disability representation?

Minimal

There is minimal focus on disability or neurodivergence. The narrative does not use disability as a lens to explore the era's social changes.

Present on Screen

Provides a nuanced look at the erosion of traditional Western institutions through cinema.
Effectively chronicles the rise of anti-establishment sentiments and moral relativism in 1970s filmmaking.
Offers a gripping historical account of the era's creative and turbulent shifts.

Limited or Absent

Lacks depth regarding the impact of racial diversity on the industry's evolution.
Fails to provide significant representation for LGBTQ+ identities or non-traditional gender expressions.
Maintains a narrow focus on male directors, reinforcing traditional patriarchal industry hierarchies.

Official Synopsis

The chronicle of the mind-blowing journey that was Hollywood during the seventies; the true and gripping story of the last golden age of American cinema, an exalted celebration of creativity and experimentation; but also of sex, drugs and rock 'n' roll: a turbulent and dark tale of ambition, envy, betrayal, hatred and self-destruction.

How are these scores produced? →