
Quiet Days in Clichy
1970

1995
Director
Christine Pascal
Runtime
95 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
This French farce chronicles one special day in the lives of a married pair of Parisian architects, Fabienne and Bruno, as they anxiously await the results of an important architectual contest they have entered. Unable to handle the stress of waiting, both turn to sexual liason's to ease their tension. Bruno ends up enacting a dark sexual fantasy with a stranger while Fabienne eventually succumbs to the advances of Bruno's friend Simon, a fortyish Lebanese businessman and part-time drug dealer. The comedy takes on overtones of psycho-drama when the contest winner announced and the couple discovers the truth of each other's actions. A cache of drugs, discovered in an apartment only adds to their troubles.
Overall Score
Good
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film focuses on the heterosexual infidelity of the central couple. It explores sexual fluidity and the transgression of monogamous norms without explicit non-cisnormative identities.
Gender Representation
Fabienne is granted significant agency and sexual autonomy, disrupting conventional domestic hierarchies. The narrative challenges the trope of the virtuous, submissive woman by centering her own desires.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The inclusion of Simon, a Lebanese businessman, adds ethnic complexity to the Parisian setting. This provides a nuanced departure from monolithic casting within the professional sphere.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film deconstructs traditional Western institutions by framing adultery and drug use as responses to systemic stress. It adopts a subjective ethical framework rather than a moralistic one.
Disability Representation
There is no discernible evidence regarding the portrayal of physical or neurodivergent disabilities in the narrative.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Adultery (A User's Guide) succeeds as a psychological study that subverts the sanctity of the nuclear family. By framing marriage as a fragile construct under professional pressure, the film moves away from traditionalist depictions of domestic stability. The narrative's strength lies in its exploration of individual agency and moral relativism. It treats characters' impulses as symptomatic of stress rather than simple moral failings, creating a complex, character-driven drama. However, the film remains largely centered on a European milieu and heterosexual dynamics. While it challenges social structures, it lacks explicit representation of queer identities or disability.

1970

1972

1983

2004

2007

2018

1961

1973

1977

2001

2004

1992
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.