New Showbiz

You are here:
All Ladies Do It

All Ladies Do It

1992

Director

Tinto Brass

Runtime

93 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

After five years of marriage, Diana discovers the joys of adultery, claiming that she can save her failing relationship through betrayal.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.6/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The narrative focuses on heteronormative sexual exploration. It lacks explicit non-cisnormative identities or same-sex intimacy as central plot drivers.

Gender Representation

Excellent

The film subverts feminine passivity by centering Diana's sexual awakening. The protagonist possesses high agency, prioritizing female pleasure and autonomy over patriarchal hierarchies.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The film operates within a homogeneous European aesthetic. There is a lack of intersectional racial diversity or engagement with multiculturalism.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The story adopts moral relativism, deconstructing the sanctity of the traditional Western family. It prioritizes individual liberation over religious or social dogma.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no meaningful engagement with disability or neurodivergence. Characters are depicted through a lens of physical idealism typical of erotic comedy.

Strengths

  • Subverts traditional gender roles by granting the female protagonist high agency.
  • Prioritizes female pleasure and bodily autonomy over patriarchal marital structures.
  • Challenges the sanctity of the traditional Western family through moral relativism.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks racial and ethnic diversity within its European-centric aesthetic.
  • Provides no representation for disability, neurodivergence, or chronic illness.
  • Excludes LGBTQ+ identities and same-sex intimacy from the narrative.

AI Analysis

Tinto Brass delivers a provocative exploration of desire that centers on female agency. By framing adultery as a tool for self-actualization, the film disrupts traditional domestic expectations and challenges the submissive wife trope. However, the work remains narrow in its scope. The focus on a specific European aesthetic results in a lack of racial and ethnic intersectionality. The narrative also ignores disability and neurodivergence entirely. Ultimately, the film is a study of individual liberation against social institutions. It succeeds in subverting gender hierarchies but fails to provide a diverse or inclusive spectrum of human experience.

How are these scores produced? →

Featured in

  • Best Gender Representation in Film
  • Best Religious & Cultural Representation in Film

Similar Movies

Movie poster for Diary of a Mad Housewife

Diary of a Mad Housewife

1970

No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.1 out of 10

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.