You are here:

Tip auf Amalia

Name: Tip auf Amalia
Director: Carl Heinz Wolff
Released: 1940
Duration: 78 min

No Poster Available

Representation Score

2.2/10

Limited

1940

Director

Carl Heinz Wolff

Runtime

78 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Tip auf Amalia is a product of the restrictive societal constraints of 1940s Germany. The film's structure reinforces traditionalist values and nationalistic standards rather than challenging them. The production adheres to the homogeneous and patriarchal norms of the period, lacking diverse representation. It upholds the existing social order through traditional family structures and rigid hierarchies. Ultimately, the film offers a narrow view of humanity, prioritizing stability and conventional archetypes over diverse or subversive perspectives.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Tip auf Amalia have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film does not include any representation of LGBTQ+ identities, which were heavily suppressed during the 1940s. The work does not challenge the assumption that everyone is straight or cisgender.

How does Tip auf Amalia portray gender?

Limited

The story reinforces traditional gender roles and domesticity. Male characters likely dominate the plot and hold positions of authority.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Tip auf Amalia?

Minimal

The cast likely reflects the homogeneous standards of 1940s German cinema. There is no indication of racial diversity or non-Germanic archetypes.

How does Tip auf Amalia represent religion and culture?

Minimal

The film upholds traditional Western institutions and moral frameworks. It does not challenge or question these norms in any way.

Does Tip auf Amalia include disability representation?

Limited

There is no evidence of nuanced representations of disabilities. Physical differences may have been used solely for comedic effect.

Present on Screen

The film provides a clear historical snapshot of the cinematic standards and systemic constraints prevalent in 1940s Germany.

Limited or Absent

The film lacks diverse representation, offering almost no visibility for LGBTQ+ identities or diverse racial backgrounds.
Gender roles are restricted to traditional hierarchies, providing little real power to female characters.
The narrative fails to offer nuanced portrayals of disabilities or diverse cultural perspectives.

Official Synopsis

In his will, the eccentric Feinsipp leaves his porter Piesicke his race horse "Amalia", to his driver his car, and to his cook Marie -- as well as to his chambermaid Barbel -- a small pension. All four now try to begin their independent existence together. Amalia is supposed to race in the next show, for Piesicke has already prophesized her victory. With the winnings, they're going to open a beer garden. But the horse ends up losing and is sold. With the money, Piesicke buys another horse and this one wins a bucket load of money in a race. Yet, in spite of this stroke of luck, the friendship among the four of them starts to fall apart from mistrust and jealousy.

How are these scores produced? →