New Showbiz

You are here:
The Color of Money

The Color of Money

1986

R

Director

Martin Scorsese

Runtime

119 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Former pool hustler "Fast Eddie" Felson decides he wants to return to the game by taking a pupil. He meets talented but green Vincent Lauria and proposes a partnership. As they tour pool halls, Eddie teaches Vincent the tricks of scamming, but he eventually grows frustrated with Vincent's showboat antics, leading to an argument and a falling-out. Eddie takes up playing again and soon crosses paths with Vincent as an opponent.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

2.7/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film operates within a strictly heteronormative framework. It lacks any depictions of non-cisnormative identities or narratives that challenge traditional sexual orientations.

Gender Representation

Limited

The narrative is driven almost exclusively by male competition and mentorship. Female characters remain peripheral, serving as atmospheric elements rather than active agents in the plot.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

The film presents a relatively homogeneous social environment. The central cast and settings emphasize a white, male-dominated demographic with little intersectional depth.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The story explores moral relativism through the lens of the 'hustle.' It deconstructs honest play, framing deception and scamming as essential professional identities.

Disability Representation

Minimal

The film does not feature prominent characters with visible or invisible disabilities. Disability is not utilized as a central narrative device.

Strengths

  • The film provides a sophisticated exploration of moral relativism through the professional hustle.
  • It successfully deconstructs conventional notions of fair play and traditional social morality.

Areas for Improvement

  • The narrative lacks gender diversity, relegating women to secondary, atmospheric roles.
  • The cast is largely homogeneous, lacking racial and ethnic depth within the subculture.
  • The film operates within a strictly heteronormative framework with no LGBTQ+ representation.

AI Analysis

Scorsese’s character study focuses on the predatory mechanics of the professional pool circuit. The film prioritizes a hyper-masculine subculture, centering on individualistic ambition and the complex ethics of the hustle. While the film offers a sophisticated look at moral relativism, it lacks demographic breadth. The social world is defined by conventional masculine bonding and a homogeneous cast that reinforces traditional hierarchies. Ultimately, the narrative's narrow focus on a specific urban subculture results in a lack of intersectional representation, prioritizing the transactional ethics of the game over a diverse social landscape.

How are these scores produced? →

Similar Movies

Movie poster for Raging Bull

Raging Bull

1980

No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.0 out of 10

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.