You are here:

A Taste of Flesh

A Taste of Flesh

Representation Score

5.1/10

Fair

1967

Director

Doris Wishman

Runtime

73 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Doris Wishman’s work offers a unique perspective for 1967 by prioritizing female subjectivity and internal psychological states. This approach challenges the era's male-centric cinematic hierarchies and standard depictions of submissive femininity. However, the film remains constrained by the genre's limitations. It lacks meaningful LGBTQ+ representation and racial diversity, featuring a largely homogeneous cast typical of low-budget exploitation cinema. Ultimately, the film serves as a transitional text. It achieves moderate success by subverting gender roles while still relying on exploitative clichés and narrow demographic representation.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does A Taste of Flesh have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film does not include explicit LGBTQ+ identities or same-sex romantic relationships. It focuses on heterosexual eroticism, fitting the conventions of the 1967 exploitation genre.

How does A Taste of Flesh portray gender?

Good

The film challenges traditional gender roles by emphasizing women's ability to drive the story and psychological complexity. It shifts away from the submissive 'damsel' stereotype to feature strong-willed female characters.

How racially and ethnically diverse is A Taste of Flesh?

Limited

The cast is predominantly homogeneous, reflecting the typical low-budget urban exploitation films of the time. There is no indication of significant racial diversity or varied ethnic representation.

How does A Taste of Flesh represent religion and culture?

Fair

The film explores moral relativism rather than traditional morality. However, it does not offer a focused critique of Western institutions such as religion or capitalism.

Does A Taste of Flesh include disability representation?

Limited

Psychological instability is a theme in the film, serving mainly as a driver for horror and eroticism. The film uses the 'unstable character' cliché without delving deeply into mental health issues.

Present on Screen

  • Centers on women's ability to drive the story and psychological complexity rather than passive roles.
  • Challenges traditional 1960s gender hierarchies through female-driven narratives.
  • Explores themes of obsession and internal volatility.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks meaningful LGBTQ+ representation or queer-coded subtext.
  • Features a homogeneous cast lacking racial and ethnic diversity.
  • Relies on the 'unstable character' cliché for mental health depictions.

Official Synopsis

Two professional assassins take over the home of two women and their "houseguest" in order to assassinate a visiting foreign dignitary.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.