You are here:

A Peck of Trouble

No Poster Available

Representation Score

0.4/10

Minimal

1968

Approved

Director

Paul J. Smith

Runtime

6 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

A Peck of Trouble adheres to the slapstick-driven animation structures common in the late 1960s. The narrative centers on a simple conflict between a woodpecker and two park rangers, emphasizing physical humor over character development. Since the story focuses on a narrow 'nature vs. authority' theme, it lacks the characters who reflect more than one aspect of diversity and social complexity found in more progressive works. The characters function as archetypes within a homogeneous setting, avoiding cultural or social exploration. Ultimately, the film serves as a typical genre piece. It does not attempt to challenge social norms or represent underrepresented identities, reflecting the limited narrative scope of mid-century short-form animation.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does A Peck of Trouble have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film does not show any LGBTQ+ relationships or characters with non-cisgender identities. The story revolves around a conflict between a woodpecker and two park rangers, focusing on physical comedy.

How does A Peck of Trouble portray gender?

Limited

The two park rangers are not specified by gender. While the era often emphasized traditional gender roles, the film does not provide any explicit descriptions of gender dynamics or hierarchies.

How racially and ethnically diverse is A Peck of Trouble?

Minimal

The setting and characters suggest a typical Western environment. There is no indication of a diverse cast or any use of color-blind casting.

How does A Peck of Trouble represent religion and culture?

Limited

The story follows a standard comedic conflict between a nuisance and institutional authority. It lacks any systemic critique or cultural deconstruction.

Does A Peck of Trouble include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no evidence of characters with visible or invisible disabilities. The film does not include any neurodivergent representation.

Present on Screen

  • The film effectively uses the classic slapstick cliché of nature versus authority.

Limited or Absent

  • The narrative lacks character depth and characters who reflect more than one aspect of diversity.
  • There is no evidence of diverse casting or cultural subversion.
  • The film relies on homogeneous, traditional social structures.

Official Synopsis

Woody drives the two park rangers of Gallstone National forest insane by pecking holes in all the trees.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.