You are here:

Zero Days

Zero Days

Representation Score

2.6/10

Limited

2016

PG-13

Director

Alex Gibney

Runtime

116 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Zero Days is a specialized investigative documentary that prioritizes geopolitical and technical analysis over identity-based representation. Its low scores in gender, LGBTQ+, and disability categories reflect the narrow, male-dominated field of high-level intelligence and cybersecurity it examines. However, the film provides significant value through its cultural critique. It challenges the perceived competence and moral clarity of Western state institutions. By framing digital warfare as a chaotic, systemic risk, it offers a sophisticated subversion of traditional power hierarchies. Ultimately, the film's diversity is found in its intellectual perspective rather than its demographic breadth. It succeeds as a critical examination of global authority, even while remaining limited in its portrayal of diverse human identities.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Zero Days have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The documentary focuses on technical, geopolitical, and intelligence-based subject matter. There are no LGBTQ+ characters or narratives addressing non-straight or non-cisgender identities.

How does Zero Days portray gender?

Limited

The narrative is dominated by male experts and intelligence officers. It lacks women's ability to drive the story, reflecting the male-dominated cybersecurity sectors depicted.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Zero Days?

Fair

The film centers on tensions between Western powers and Iran. While international in scope, the primary perspectives belong to Western intelligence and technical experts.

How does Zero Days represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The film excels at deconstructing Western institutional authority. It critiques the legality of state-sponsored digital warfare and the destabilizing nature of geopolitical power structures.

Does Zero Days include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no discernible focus on physical or neurodivergent representation within this technical and political investigative documentary.

Present on Screen

  • Provides a sophisticated critique of Western institutional authority and state-sponsored digital warfare.
  • Highlights the chaotic risks of digital escalation in national security.
  • Offers a complex, postmodern view of global power structures operating in ethically ambiguous zones.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks female representation and ability to act within the intelligence and cybersecurity sectors.
  • Does not include LGBTQ+ narratives or perspectives on non-straight or non-cisgender identities.
  • Does not feature physical or neurodivergent representation within its technical subject matter.

Official Synopsis

Alex Gibney explores the phenomenon of Stuxnet, a self-replicating computer virus discovered in 2010 by international IT experts. Evidently commissioned by the US and Israeli governments, this malware was designed to specifically sabotage Iran’s nuclear programme. However, the complex computer worm ended up not only infecting its intended target but also spreading uncontrollably.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.