The documentary lacks any meaningful focus on LGBTQ+ identities. The narrative remains strictly confined to the corporate and legal fallout of the Theranos scandal.

The film examines gender performance by showing how Elizabeth Holmes adopted masculine-coded traits to gain legitimacy. It critiques how gendered expectations influence professional credibility in male-dominated sectors.

The narrative focuses on the socioeconomic elite of Silicon Valley, depicted as a largely homogeneous group. It offers little in the way of racial or ethnic intersectionality.

The film provides a profound critique of late-stage capitalism and the American tech 'cult of personality.' It challenges the sanctity of Western corporate and regulatory institutions.

There is no significant focus on disability or neurodivergence. The film does not engage with the lived experiences of those with physical or sensory impairments.