You are here:
That Man: Peter Berlin

That Man: Peter Berlin

2006

NR

Director

Jim Tushinski

Runtime

80 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

He slept with Sal Mineo, was photographed by Andy Warhol, and he was lusted after by millions of men around the world. Model, photographer, filmmaker, clothing designer, and porn icon Peter Berlin is his own greatest creation. Berlin is front and center in this bio documentary from director Jim Tushinski, and featuring interviews with director John Waters, novelist Armistead Maupin, 70s porn director Wakefield Poole and more, all with Berlin as the subject. This intimate film reveals the legendary man with the white saran wrapped pants, undersized leather vests, and Dutch-boy haircut

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

7.6/10

Good


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Excellent

The film is a vital piece of queer historiography centered on LGBTQ+ history. It places queer sexuality and gay male aesthetics at the heart of the narrative, exploring the reclamation of the male gaze.

Gender Representation

Excellent

The documentary offers a sophisticated analysis of gender performance. It explores hyper-masculinity as a deliberate, stylized aesthetic choice rather than a static biological fact, deconstructing traditional masculine hierarchies.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

The biographical focus remains largely centered on the white, queer underground of the mid-20th century. The narrative does not actively prioritize or center diverse racial perspectives within Berlin's social circles.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The film prioritizes the exploration of queer subcultures on the periphery of mainstream institutions. It implicitly critiques restrictive mid-century social norms by favoring individualistic expression and sexual autonomy.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no significant evidence regarding the portrayal of physical or neurodivergent disabilities as central narrative elements in this biographical study.

Strengths

  • Provides a profound look at non-heteronormative identity and queer visual culture.
  • Deconstructs masculinity by presenting it as a performative and stylized tool.
  • Elevates marginalized subcultures into subjects of serious cinematic and historical study.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks active centering of diverse racial perspectives within the historical narrative.
  • Focus remains heavily concentrated on a specific white, mid-century underground subculture.

AI Analysis

Jim Tushinski’s documentary is an exceptional study of niche historical documentation. It elevates queer eroticism into a legitimate subject of artistic and sociological inquiry, disrupting traditional biographical tropes by focusing on identity construction. The film succeeds in documenting how Peter Berlin used visual media to curate an idealized masculine identity. This approach provides a nuanced look at the systemic pressures of the era while respecting the subject's agency. While the film excels in its queer-centric focus, it remains limited by its narrow demographic scope. The narrative's concentration on a specific white, underground subculture leaves little room for broader racial or ethnic perspectives.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.