You are here:

Losing Iraq

Losing Iraq

Representation Score

7.2/10

Good

2014

TV-PG

Director

Michael Kirk

Runtime

84 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Losing Iraq is a sophisticated documentary that disrupts traditional patriotic war narratives. It moves beyond simple combat stories to examine the systemic failures of Western institutional authority and the geopolitical status quo. The film excels by integrating individual experiences of trauma and ethnic diversity into a broader socio-political critique. It avoids stereotypes, particularly regarding veteran disability, and uses these lived experiences to challenge the perceived competence of state-led power dynamics. However, the film remains limited by its focus on military and policy-driven hierarchies. This results in a lack of representation for LGBTQ+ identities and a secondary role for female perspectives within the broader narrative structure.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Losing Iraq have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film focuses on geopolitical strategy and military leadership. There are no visible LGBTQ+ characters or narratives centered around non-assuming gender matches what was assigned at birth identities.

How does Losing Iraq portray gender?

Fair

The narrative centers on male-dominated military and policy hierarchies. While it touches on how conflict affects families and women, these perspectives remain secondary to combatants.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Losing Iraq?

Good

The documentary highlights the diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds of American veterans. It also engages with post-colonial themes regarding the impact of Western intervention on Iraqis.

How does Losing Iraq represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The film critiques Western foreign policy and the efficacy of traditional institutions. It examines the unintended consequences of military intervention and questions interventionist nationalism.

Does Losing Iraq include disability representation?

Good

The film provides nuanced coverage of physical and psychological disabilities. It treats PTSD and physical injuries as significant consequences of political decisions rather than mere plot devices.

Present on Screen

  • Provides a nuanced, non-stereotypical portrayal of veteran physical and psychological disabilities.
  • Challenges Western hegemony through a meaningful post-colonial critique of military intervention.
  • Avoids monolithic portrayals of soldiers by centering the diverse ethnic backgrounds of the military.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks representation or narratives centered on LGBTQ+ identities.
  • Maintains a male-dominated perspective by prioritizing military and policy hierarchies over gender diversity.

Official Synopsis

Examines the unfolding chaos in Iraq and how the U.S. is being pulled back into the conflict. Drawing on interviews with policymakers and military leaders, the film traces the U.S. role from the 2003 invasion to the current violence, showing how Iraq itself is coming undone, how we got here, what went wrong, and what happens next.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.