New Showbiz

You are here:
Once Upon a Time... in Hollywood

Once Upon a Time... in Hollywood

2019

R

Director

Quentin Tarantino

Runtime

162 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Los Angeles, 1969. TV star Rick Dalton, a struggling actor specializing in westerns, and stuntman Cliff Booth, his best friend, try to survive in a constantly changing movie industry. Dalton is the neighbor of the young and promising actress and model Sharon Tate, who has just married the prestigious Polish director Roman Polanski…

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.4/10

Fair

Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film centers on heteronormative social structures and traditional romantic pairings. It lacks prominent LGBTQ+ characters or narratives that actively critique the era's social norms.

Gender Representation

Fair

While male-centric hierarchies dominate, Sharon Tate is portrayed with significant agency and autonomy. The film also explores the emotional vulnerability of the masculine archetype through Rick Dalton.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The cast is predominantly Anglo-Saxon, reflecting the white-dominated Hollywood studio system of the late 1960s. It does not prioritize non-white characters in central, high-agency roles.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The narrative explores the tension between Old Hollywood traditionalism and the New Hollywood counter-culture. It uses a fairy-tale structure to engage in historical revisionism and moral relativism.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There are no prominent depictions of visible or invisible disabilities that drive the plot or serve as central character arcs.

Strengths

  • Sharon Tate is depicted with agency and joy, challenging the typical victim trope.
  • The film deconstructs the 'stoic leading man' archetype through Rick Dalton's vulnerability.
  • Uses a revisionist fairy-tale structure to subvert historical tragedy and systemic violence.

Areas for Improvement

  • The cast is predominantly white, reflecting a lack of racial diversity in central roles.
  • The narrative lacks prominent LGBTQ+ representation or characters.
  • There is no significant representation of characters with disabilities.

AI Analysis

The film functions as a postmodern exercise in revisionist history. It prioritizes historical period accuracy and a predominantly white cast over traditional demographic diversity metrics. However, it achieves progressive value through its narrative architecture. By using a 'what-if' framework, the film disrupts historical tragedy and challenges the inevitability of systemic violence. Ultimately, the work finds strength in deconstructing historical reality and critiquing the rigid social hierarchies of the 1960s rather than through broad demographic inclusion.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.