
My Friend Rashed
2011

2021
Director
Davide Ferrario
Runtime
102 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
How the citizens of Malta fought for independence from Britain in 1919. When the Army was sent to quell the riots and the British government covered up the bloody encounter, more than 100 Maltese were accused of instigating the violence and jailed.
Overall Score
Good
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film focuses on the socio-political struggle for national independence. There is no evidence of LGBTQ+ characters or narratives addressing non-heteronormative identities.
Gender Representation
The narrative centers on geopolitical and class-based struggles. It may rely on traditional gender roles common in early 20th-century historical dramas, though civilian roles might offer female agency.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The story centers a non-Anglo-Saxon Maltese population against a dominant British colonial power. This prioritizes local agency and deconstructs common Western-centric historical tropes.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film portrays British colonial institutions as oppressive and corrupt. It emphasizes the systemic victimization of a local population and critiques official historical records through a lens of resistance.
Disability Representation
There is no discernible information regarding the portrayal of physical or neurodivergent disabilities within the film's narrative.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Blood on the Crown functions as a historical critique of imperial hegemony. By centering the 1919 Maltese struggle, the film shifts focus from official colonial records to the lived experiences of the colonized. It examines the friction between state power and local autonomy through the lens of systemic corruption. The film's strength lies in its structural commitment to anti-colonialism. It effectively deconstructs the 'civilizing mission' trope by portraying the British government and military as instruments of oppression rather than providers of order. However, the film lacks representation for LGBTQ+ identities and disabilities. The narrative appears heavily weighted toward masculine-coded political agitation and combat, which may limit the breadth of its social commentary.

2011

2002

1964

2012

1971

2009

2018

2014

2021

2019

1986

1971
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.