You are here:

The Rifleman

The Rifleman

Representation Score

5.3/10

Fair

2019

Not Rated

Director

Dzintars Dreibergs

Runtime

124 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

The Rifleman is a character-driven historical drama that prioritizes humanistic perspectives over nationalistic myths. It succeeds by deconstructing the traditional 'heroic soldier' archetype, replacing it with a study of isolation and systemic trauma. While the film lacks representation of LGBTQ+ identities or disabilities, it provides a nuanced look at ethnic identity and national ability to act within an imperial structure. It effectively uses the protagonist's struggle to critique the impact of imperialist power structures on smaller nations. Ultimately, the film's strength lies in its subversion of wartime archetypes, shifting the focus from state glory to the lived experience of the individual.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does The Rifleman have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The story follows a traditional heterosexual relationship for the main character. There is no indication of LGBTQ+ identities or non-binary gender roles in the narrative.

How does The Rifleman portray gender?

Fair

The film focuses on male experiences during war and loss. It challenges typical heroic masculinity by highlighting vulnerability and trauma instead of military prowess.

How racially and ethnically diverse is The Rifleman?

Fair

The narrative explores Latvian identity within the Russian Empire. It centers on the perspective of a smaller nation being used as a pawn by larger imperial powers.

How does The Rifleman represent religion and culture?

Good

The film critiques imperial institutions and the machinery of war. It emphasizes individual ability to act over state-sanctioned patriotism and collective nationalism.

Does The Rifleman include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no information available regarding the portrayal of physical or neurodivergent disabilities in this work.

Present on Screen

  • Challenges traditional masculine archetypes by emphasizing vulnerability and trauma over military success.
  • Provides a nuanced exploration of ethnic identity and national ability to act within an imperial structure.
  • Offers a critical, anti-imperialist perspective that prioritizes individual experience over state patriotism.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks visible representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-binary gender roles.
  • Provides no evidence of characters with physical or neurodivergent disabilities.
  • Focuses heavily on a traditional heterosexual romantic framework.

Official Synopsis

The love story of sixteen-year-old Arturs is interrupted by the First World War. After losing his mother and his home, he finds some consolation in joining the army, because this is the first time national battalions are allowed in the Russian Empire. But war is nothing like Arturs imagined – no glory, no fairness. It is brutal and painful. Arturs is now completely alone as war takes the lives of his father and brother. Also, no progress is made in the promised quick resolution of the war and timely return home. Within the notion that only he alone cares about returning home and that his homeland is just a playground for other nations, Arturs finds strength for the final battle and eventually returns home to start everything from scratch, just like his newly born country.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.