You are here:

Proper Attire Required

Name: Proper Attire Required
Director: Philippe Lioret
Released: 1997
Duration: 93 min

Representation Score

3.9/10

Limited

1997

PG-13

Director

Philippe Lioret

Runtime

93 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Proper Attire Required primarily serves as a social critique of class disparity and institutional rigidity. It uses humor to explore how systemic structures, such as legal and financial frameworks, can be used against the impoverished. The film excels in portraying the tension between individual ability to act and the bureaucratic machinery of the state, particularly in the context of unemployment and social welfare. However, it falls short in representing diversity in LGBTQ+ identities, racial and ethnic diversity, and disability.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Proper Attire Required have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film focuses on traditional heterosexual marriages and does not include any significant queer narratives or characters with diverse gender identities.

How does Proper Attire Required portray gender?

Fair

The story revolves around the protagonist's relationship with his estranged wife. She holds considerable financial power but her influence is tied to her high-society marriage and political ambitions.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Proper Attire Required?

Limited

The narrative emphasizes class differences rather than racial or ethnic diversity. The story contrasts a poor Parisian resident with the wealthy international elite, highlighting socioeconomic disparities.

How does Proper Attire Required represent religion and culture?

Good

The film critiques Western institutions, showing how legal and bureaucratic systems can be oppressive to those on the margins of society.

Does Proper Attire Required include disability representation?

Minimal

There are no visible or invisible disabilities that play a central role in the character arcs or the plot progression.

Present on Screen

Sharp critique of capitalist hierarchies and exclusive high-society spaces.
Effective portrayal of the tension between underrepresented individuals and institutional bureaucracies.
Nuanced look at how socioeconomic status affects mobility and legal vulnerability.

Limited or Absent

Lacks significant representation of LGBTQ+ identities or narratives.
Overemphasizes class distinctions at the expense of racial and ethnic diversity.
Does not include disability representation in its character arcs or central plot.

Official Synopsis

His estranged wife is worth millions, but poor Paris resident Richard is homeless and jobless. He applied for unemployment benefits and now faces charges of fraud. To save himself from nine months in jail he must find his wife and force her to tell the courts the truth, that though she has married a politically-ambitious American governor and is filing U.S. tax returns, she is technically still married to Richard. But as she lives in America, how can he get to her? Opportunity knocks when Richard learns that she and her husband will be attending an international conference at an exclusive Paris hotel. To get in he will need a disguise.

How are these scores produced? →